A Nobel Prize-winning researcher has admitted on a blog that he relied on weak studies in a chapter of his bestselling book.
http://retractionwatch.com/2017/02/20/placed-much-faith-underpowered-studies-nobel-prize-winner-admits-mistakes/
What I don't understand is how can small sample studies be erroneous if they are of high quality?I agree the CI 's will be wide, but that shouldn't make it wrong. Any thought?
Thanks
|