Dear Naveen,
We two can *not* both sit in the same chair at the same time (the logic of
privilege)
Sitting in a chair can be seen as the assertion of an identity (the
politics of privilege)
Not sitting in a chair can be seen as a loss of privilege (the psychology
of privilege)
The chair can be built so I can not sit in the chair
(materiality/facticity of privilege)
And to expand the horizons:
The father or the son or neither or both can sit on the poor donkey (the
ethical structure of privilege)
and
If there is only on Coke bottle such that only one member of the tribe can
be privileged, then the Gods Must be Crazy. (the sociology/theology of
privilege)
Cheers
keith
On 5/07/2016, 5:15 AM, "PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD
studies and related research in Design on behalf of Naveen Bagalkot"
<[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>But before I get to the concrete statements, let me bring in other
>statements to highlight that the unwillingness to see privilege is
>structural, and hence more than any one person, the moderators and the
>general so-called liberal expectations of a civilized exchange between
>multiple truthsı that are detrimental to this space.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|