These lengthy discussions are now involving only a small number of people. As a result people are getting fed up and signing off the list, as they usually do on such occasions. I think these are important issues which I think most people would agree are worth airing on the list, but, as 'list-owner' can I suggest that it's now time to take them off-list and continue the discussion among yourselves. Even better, why not turn them into an article for Radical Statistics.
Alison Macfarlane
-----Original Message-----
From: John Whittington [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 30 June 2016 11:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Translation of neo-liberalism
At 09:12 30/06/2016 +0000, L Brownstein wrote:
>John, it is neither liberal nor new.
Indeed - that was the point of my nearly rhetorical question!
>But that is the term that now applies to this particular constellation
>of policy objectives.
So it seems. Needless to say, I was aware, from the context in which it is usually used, of roughly what the word is used to mean - it was the word itself that I was really asking about! I was interested in the initial comment about 'current usage' in the Wikipedia article:
" According to Boas and Gans-Morse, neoliberalism is commonly used as a catchphrase and pejorative term, outpacing similar terms such as monetarism, neoconservatism, the Washington Consensus and "market reform"
in much scholarly writing. Jones, a historian of the concept, says the term "is too often used as a catch-all shorthand for the horrors associated with globalization and recurring financial crises" "
Kind Regards,
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225
Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893
Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK
----------------------------------------------------------------
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************
|