Dear Jerry,
I donšt mind the account you give - it is very sensible and we can all
recognise it as an account of what we tell ourselves we do.
My more tortured account was aiming at getting us closer to what I see we
actually do which was the basis of my original contribution to this topic.
Aristotle in his account of the enthymeme was trying to get to what we
mostly actually do when we argue.
Pierce was trying to illustrate how we often use abductive logic in the
way we go about thinking through things.
Whether his help any one design, to know how they go about designing, is
another matter.
keith
On 16/03/2016, 9:25 AM, "PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD
studies and related research in Design on behalf of Jerry Diethelm"
<[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Dear, Chuck, Ken, Keith et al,
>
>
>Deduction from experience:
>
>I suggest that a simple example of the presence of deduction in design
>thinking occurs along with the abductive projection of possible design
>developmental paths to follow when one deduces that one path is probably
>the
>more productive based on past experiences in similar design situations.
>
>Jerry
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|