JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  February 2016

PHD-DESIGN February 2016

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Assume fixed number of colours in design?

From:

Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:54:08 +0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (200 lines)

Hi Martin,
Thanks.
It was a mistake on my part - and I'm not that sure that people do want my
views...
Cheers,
Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Salisbury, Martin
Sent: Saturday, 20 February 2016 5:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; 'Ken Friedman' <[log in to unmask]>;
'PhD-Design' <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]; 'Eduardo
corte-real' <[log in to unmask]>; 'Stuart MEDLEY' <[log in to unmask]>;
[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: Assume fixed number of colours in design?

Hi Terry,

Is there a reason why your message wasn't sent to the full list? I had
thought this was a PhD Design list discussion. I am sure everyone would like
to hear your views.

Best wishes

Martin

Professor Martin Salisbury
Course Leader, MA Children's Book Illustration Director, The Centre for
Children's Book Studies Cambridge School of Art
0845 196 2351
[log in to unmask]

http://www.cambridgemashow.com

http://www.anglia.ac.uk/ruskin/en/home/microsites/ccbs.html


________________________________________
From: Terence Love [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 6:13 AM
To: 'Ken Friedman'; 'PhD-Design'; [log in to unmask]; 'Eduardo
corte-real'; 'Stuart MEDLEY'; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]; Salisbury, Martin
Subject: RE: Assume fixed number of colours in design?

Dear Ken, Eduardo, David, Sue, Stuart, Gunnar, Martin and all

Ken, I can see that what I wrote doesn't make sense to you - yet. Perhaps
what follows may help.

One of the points I've made many times on this list is about awareness of
the layering of theories and analyses, the roles of meta-analysis of
theories and the precursor constraints shaping theory making.

A second point I've made is about the way that information about the
behaviours of a theory  and its predictions, and the constraints on it can
be of more use than the theory itself.

A third issue is that it seems important also to distinguish between, and
consider separately,  the real world, theory as perceived, representations
of theory (theory written down) , theory as its abstract self (different
from the previous two),  how characteristics of theory are shaped, and how
characteristics of theories shape other things (typically other theories).

The essays of John Chris Jones that Cameron made available follow the same
points in many places.

The question I posted about colour was a meta-level query about one of many
factors that shape theory making about design activity, and, more
importantly, about predicting particular outcomes from it.

Specifically, the question focuses on the implications for deriving
predictive theory about the outcomes (not outputs) resulting from our
creation of designs, with respect to the inclusion of issues of colour.

More specifically, it focuses on how assumptions we make about the
continuity of colour spectrums shape the ease, practicality and usefulness
of making design theories predicting outcomes in the real world about design
activity.

When we assume colour is a continuous spectrum, then in making design theory
that includes this we are restricted to using design theory structures and
theories that can encompass colour use, design and perception as continuous.

In contrast, when we assume colour is used, designed and perceived as
discrete units of individual colour incorporating a range of electromagnetic
spectrum , or discrete segments of the electromagnetic spectrum (i.e. each a
range of colour that we can regard as the same colour), we can use other
design theory structures and theories that do not need to address colour
being continuous. Note: there is no assumption that it will be the same
bands of the electromagnetic spectrum in each case, only that there will be
bands representing each colour rather than colour being continuous spectrum.

The reason this may be significant is that we (as the design research
community) have had difficulty in developing design theories for predicting
the outcomes in the world resulting from designs and design decisions.
Moving from a continuous picture of colour to a discrete one  potentially
offers a pathway to better and easier design theories.

Part of the difficulty of creating design theory for predicting outcomes has
been the need to have over-simplistic theories that can address colour and
other factors as continuous. One of the key things about theories that
represent continuous functions is they either require a huge depth in
abstract thinking (and almost always the use of serious maths) OR they
require reducing theories to simplistic form that removes their predictive
ability. The latter is what has manily occurred in design.

In contrast, if colour is discontinuous and there exists a measure of the
coarseness of its segmentation (e.g. Pantone has 3000 colours, or there are
three primary colours, or the sRGB colour space has 16.7E6 colours)  then we
can use very different forms of design theories to predict outcomes from
design activity that are more discrete in form, and these are theories that
are potentially manageable without either over simplification or a lot of
maths.

I suggest that the reality already exists that we accept multiple colours as
the same ( although different arrangements in different circumstances). This
means that in practical terms the colour spectrum comprises discrete bands
of equivalence of colour, rather than being a continuous spectrum in which a
colour even minisculy different in frequency is different in use, design and
perception. We already accept multiple colours as the same in many ways: our
individual eyes see colours differently, our eyes see colours differently at
different time of the day, colour is perceived differently due to many
environmental factors, for practical and financial reasons we accept that
colours printed (or on screen) are what was intended even when they are
slightly different, etc.

In conclusion, my suggestion is that for the purposes of developing better
design theories that move towards predicting outcomes resulting from
designs,  we pragmatically  accept the practical reality of a spread of
colours being the same colour, rather than seeing colour in an abstract
manner as a continuous microscopically differentiated electromagnetic
spectrum.

Best wishes,
Terence

---
Dr Terence Love
PhD(UWA), BA(Hons) Engin. PGCEd, FDRS, PMACM, MISI Love Services Pty Ltd PO
Box 226, Quinns Rocks Western Australia 6030
Tel: +61 (0)4 3497 5848
[log in to unmask]
www.loveservices.com.au
--


-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Friedman
Sent: Saturday, 20 February 2016 5:45 AM
To: PhD-Design <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Assume fixed number of colours in design?

Ken
<snip> Terry Love's question does not make sense to me.


--
Book an Open Day
http://www.anglia.ac.uk/study/open-day

UK Entrepreneurial University of the Year

 

In the official 2014 government assessment of our research the following 12
areas were found to have world-leading research: Allied Health Professions;
Architecture & Built Environment; Art & Design; Business & Management
Studies; Communication, Cultural & Media Studies; English Language &
Literature; Geography & Environmental Studies; History; Law; Music, Drama &
Dance; Psychology; and Social Work & Social Policy.
This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the above named
recipient(s) only and may be privileged. If they have come to you in error
you must take  no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to
anyone: please reply to this e-mail to highlight the error and then
immediately delete the e-mail from your system. Any opinions expressed are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or
opinions of Anglia Ruskin University.
Although measures have been taken to ensure that this e-mail and attachments
are free from any virus we advise that, in keeping with good computing
practice, the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Please
note that this message has been sent over public networks which may not be a
100% secure communications.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD
studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager