Dear Keith,
The grunt/groan system has been the default for decades. Bank statements, phone bills, medicine leaflets, legal contracts, creditcard payment reviews, eviction notices, insurance documents, labels from pharmacists, tax forms, and ballot forms are just a few examples where machines grunt and people groan.
Designing grunting systems certainly generates hard cash. And if it is done well, it enables people to act appropriately and saves cash, time, and efforts. The question is: who do you automate for? For machines? Or for people?
Kind regards,
Karel.
[log in to unmask]
>>
> On 25 Sep 2015, at 00:00, Keith Russell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Dear Karel,
>
> The next step, after this step, is to automate the readers/listeners so
> that we have a grunt/groan system. The machine grunts and the receivers of
> the communication from the machine, groan. Then we have an exchange of
> bitcoins telephatically.
>
> keith
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|