On 2015-06-18 15:53, Eduardo corte-real wrote:
> Dear João,
> The problem with this kind of computer generated images is that their
> "authors" or "generators" don't have the faintest clue about what art
> must
> be when it is done today. All contemporary art must be Contemporary,
> otherwise it will fall out from any definition of Art. There is a
> complicated system to validate Art that goes far above "stunnement". In
> that system you have Art Historians, Art Critics.Art Galleries,
> Museums,
> Art Schools and Established Art Publications. I thin that these images
> would fail legitimation in almost all those instances.
> I'm quite sure what to think about this.
> Cheers,
> Eduardo Corte-Real
>
That is masterfully explained by Clancey, in "Situated Cognition: On
Human Knowledge and Computer Representations", regarding Aaron.
---
Notice that in this particular instance the aim of the researchers was
to find out how the "hidden layers" of their neural networks are
working.
--
Best regards,
==================================
Carlos Pires
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
-------------------------------------------------------------
Design & New Media MFA // Communication Design PhD Student @ FBA-UL
Check the project blog:
http://thegolemproject.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|