On 16/06/2015, at 18:05, Ken Friedman wrote:
> Friends,
>
> May I suggest that there is no need to use “was” headers for what is effectively a new thread? This clutters up the list archive and makes following threads more difficult.
>
> Taking a specific subsidiary idea from an earlier thread may be the occasion of a new thread. When it is, the best thing to do is simply to start a new thread. It is courteous to acknowledge that the idea occurred within the earlier thread. The subject header (thread title) should cover the actual topic of the thread.
>
> My two cents.
>
> Yours,
>
> Ken
...not only that, but most tangents to the OP should probably be posted under another subject, IMHO. We have recently seen some threads that discuss 3 or 4 different topics.
Bes regards,
==================================
Carlos Pires
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
-------------------------------------------------------------
Design & New Media MFA // Communication Design PhD Student @ FBA-UL
Check the project blog:
http://thegolemproject.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|