Hi Mike,
Here's a paper that looked at accuracy and time spent with and without
autocomplete for a health system.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24734137
Cheers
Jim
On 8 June 2015 at 15:29, Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone know of any work that has been done that looks at goodness /
> completeness / accuracy of data that has been keyed into a system and
> compared this to the interface that was used when entering this data?
>
> As I look at this (no names) rather terrible bit of museum-focused
> software it strikes me quite strongly that had it had auto-complete fields
> / dropdowns / checkboxes in a nice, slick, user-friendly layout rather than
> free text / textarea fields in a really rather clunky interface then the
> data would have been very much easier to put in and subsequently of much
> better quality..
>
> Any research, either museumy or not that anyone can point me to?
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> _____________________________
>
>
> *Mike Ellis *
>
> Thirty8 Digital: a small but perfectly formed digital agency:
> http://thirty8.co.uk <http://thirty8.co.uk/>
>
> * My book: http://heritageweb.co.uk <http://heritageweb.co.uk/> *
>
>
> ****************************************************************
> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************
>
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|