I think I saw recently (possibly in Andrew Sayer's 'Why We Can't Afford the Rich') that one third wealth is simply inherited, one third is entrepreneurial (Dyson et al) and one third inherited but worked up entrepreneurially. Not absolutely certain of reference.
Those who remember 'Punch' may recollect a cartoon of a man standing with his son at the window looking across an industrial complex and saying 'I started right at the bottom with just one factory'.
Robert
Professor Robert Moore
School of Sociology and Social Policy
Eleanor Rathbone Building
The University of Liverpool
L69 7ZA
Telephone and fax: 44 (0) 1352 714456
________________________________________
From: email list for Radical Statistics [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Gavin & Rosemary Ross [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 11 March 2015 14:22
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Moneyed inheritance and the Socialist Will - advice please!
The hypocrisy is surely on the Tory side, when benefits claimants on £80 a
week are described as wanting 'something for nothing' ( i.e. the means of
survival), while inherited wealth which provides much greater somethings for
nothing is not to be taxed, and may allow future generations of wealthy
families to avoid having to do any serious work.
Some time ago there was a figure given to the percentage of millionaires
who had actually earned their wealth, compared with those who had merely
inherited or married into it, and it was around 90 per cent. Are there more
recent figures?
Gavin Ross
-----Original Message-----
From: Clive Durdle
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 1:40 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Moneyed inheritance and the Socialist Will - advice please!
I have done more mulling than I realised!
https://clivedurdle.wordpress.com/2010/05/14/enabling-the-future-to-participate/
Sent from my iPad
> On 11 Mar 2015, at 13:32, Clive Durdle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I have mulled over these ideas but nothing definite! I think some
> principles would be around building the common wealth, using cohousing
> cooperative ideas, new Lanark, news from nowhere. Ostrom, zero energy
> communities. There was thinking about this in 70's and 80's - green town
> Milton Keynes but not sure what is happening recently - lilac cohousing
> Leeds are us projects, extra care cohousing ......
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 11 Mar 2015, at 12:43, John Bibby <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> We often complain about inherited wealth.
>>
>> Yet most of us were born into comparatively wealthy families (top 50%),
>> and many receive considerable sums from parents, friends and relatives at
>> times when we don't really need it.
>>
>> I see risks of hypocrisy here, and want to ensure that my own 'wealth' is
>> well-used.
>>
>> How should one write one's will? Lawyers may help with the legalities.
>> But who can guide on the ethics?
>>
>> I'd welcome comments on or off-list from anyone who has grappled with
>> this, or who is interested in it. Am glad to discuss informally and
>> confidentially too. My phone is 01904-330334.
>>
>>
>>
>> JOHN BIBBY
>> ****************************************************** Please note that
>> if you press the 'Reply' button your message will go only to the sender
>> of this message. If you want to reply to the whole list, use your
>> mailer's 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically to
>> [log in to unmask] Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are
>> the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the
>> range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To
>> find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and
>> read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit
>> our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
>> *******************************************************
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and
cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by
subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical
Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of
our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************
|