Hi all,
A personal follow on to the questions about student involvement in misconduct hearings. There is a range of responses, from "No way!" to "Yes, and here's all the training!" Fascinating diversity.
Currently, I'm investigating simple failed assessments (that would allow 40% capped referrals) in contrast to assignments that are resat as a result of misconduct.
1) Does your institution draw a distinction between students who have just failed, versus those who engaged in academic misconduct? Are there regulations that treat each differently?
2a) Are whole modules capped in either case, even if only one element of assessment was failed or where an offence was committed? How much are they capped by? 40%? 0%? Other?
2b) Or are just the failed/offending elements themselves capped in one or the other case? Again, how much capping is there?
3) In the latter situation, is there any concern that a resit can produce effectively the same result as that for a student who is resitting due to having committed an offence?
Again, could you respond by tomorrow night if possible, and send to [log in to unmask] if you need it to be anonymous. I'll summarise here at the end of next week.
Thanks for your time! :-)
--
WiMii?
*************************************************************************
You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change
your subscription options, or access list archives, visit
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html
*************************************************************************
|