Thank you very much, Sheila. I appreciate you saying that.
L
On 12 February 2015 at 17:36, Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Very, very compelling, Lawrence. I was thinking about line breaks and the
> motion here, debating with myself on whether to consider longer lines as a
> thought. Well, now you've heard it. Very graceful noticing and beautiful
> imagery. Hats off!
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > white flowers greyed brick;
> >
> > porcelain Venus; dog
> >
> > breathing heavily,
> >
> > collapsing; creeper
> >
> > over walls; voices
> >
> > on a weak loudspeaker
> >
> > van between cars;
> >
> > automated distaste bad style,
> >
> > she says, increasingly,
> >
> > I hear voices,
> >
> > repetition of
> >
> > the obvious footholds
> >
> > in a failing cliff, high
> >
> > speed down hill, a broken
> >
> > arbour, desolate fields,
> >
> > inspection plate, man
> >
> > with a machine gun, buried
> >
> > cables, burst communications,
> >
> > a paint pot rusty
> >
> > from rain, dry now;
> >
> > another tipped on its
> >
> > side, a smile indicating
> >
> > trust, implying it
> >
> > at least, an indicative
> >
> > mutter, pardon is self-
> >
> > conscious defensive
> >
> > aggression held back;
> >
> > a small periscope;
> >
> > muffled voices calm;
> >
> > complete solutions;
> >
> > men with triumphant
> >
> > faces, gesturing
> >
> > in motion, displays
> >
> > flickering, capital
> >
> > expenditure loose;
> >
> > a typhoon of inner
> >
> > ear, petals unfolding
> >
> > from covered faces;
> >
> > circumnavigation
> >
> > of bare electric wires
> >
>
|