Thanks, Marko.
Yes, I was wondering about that when I saw interpolation 'trilinear'
checked in SPM, the warp looks good for my subjects, and on a first
check they seemed binary, still I am running the -bin flag for fslmaths.
Thanks again, have a great Tuebinger weekend,
Barbara
On 29/01/2015 16:43, Marko Wilke wrote:
> Barbara,
>
> you're welcome. One thing to remember, by the way, when you are
> de-normalizing masks: make sure they are indeed binary (if you want
> them to be, which I do not know) after transforming to native space.
> Interpolation may introduce values other than 0 and 1 into a hitherto
> binary image, and this may not be what you want.
>
> Cheers,
> Marko
>
> Barbara Kreilkamp wrote:
>> Dear Marko,
>>
>> Thanks a lot. I found the procedure that worked for me under the link
>> you sent.
>> I first use 'New Segment' and save the inverse deformation field as a
>> nifti file.
>> I then use this in the Deformations tool and apply the field to the
>> masks.
>> Worked just fine.
>>
>> Thanks for helping out so quickly!
>> Best wishes,
>> Barbara
>>
>>
>> On 29/01/2015 14:40, Marko Wilke wrote:
>>> Barbara,
>>>
>>> this is a common request on the list, and several important points
>>> were nicely summarized by Gabor here:
>>>
>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=SPM;f2d07451.1209
>>>
>>> as well as by others in several other posts with variations of "undo
>>> normalization", "map to subject space", "invert normalization",
>>> "de-normalize" etc.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>> Marko
>>>
>>>
>>> Barbara Kreilkamp wrote:
>>>> Dear SPM-ers,
>>>>
>>>> I am using MATLAB 2013a with SPM8 and I'd like to warp masks that are
>>>> defined on the ICBM template into individual subject space.
>>>>
>>>> Could you please provide me with a clue if Normalize (estimate and
>>>> write) is my only option?
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>> Barbara
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
|