JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  November 2014

PHD-DESIGN November 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Request - resources on double column setting of books

From:

David Sless <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 28 Nov 2014 12:35:50 +1100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (217 lines)

Terry,

Have you considered using thiner paper for the pages? Providing this does not create see through problems or problems with turning flimsier paper, that might give you your 50 gms.

David
-- 





blog: http://communication.org.au/blog/ <http://communication.org.au/blog/>
web: http://communication.org.au <http://communication.org.au/>

Professor David Sless BA MSc FRSA
CEO • Communication Research Institute •
• helping people communicate with people •

Mobile: +61 (0)412 356 795
Phone: +61 (0)3 9005 5903
Skype: davidsless

60 Park Street • Fitzroy North • Melbourne • Australia • 3068

> On 28 Nov 2014, at 12:00 pm, Terence Love <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Gunnar, Carlos and Verdian,
> 
> I'm trying to use design to address a  problem of  anti-competitiveness of
> American commercial globalisation. 
> 
> The practical design problem is  retypesetting a book (B5) to reduce its
> weight by 50gms (2oz). This requires losing 14-15 pages. It's a text book so
> the  most obvious way is to go to two columns. While this is happening it
> seems useful to use best practice from research and  evidence to add to
> conventional design to improve readability.
> 
> And the problem of anti-competitiveness of American commercial
> globalisation? I knew you were going to ask. 
> 
> In this case,  the problem is of losses for small specialist publishers
> outside America selling through Amazon at numbers too low to use a US
> distributor. 
> 
> When books from overseas are sold through Amazon.com to a customer in the
> US, Amazon allows publishers only  $3.99 postage. Real postage cost from
> Australia for book over 500gms is $29.70. This makes specialist mid-cost
> text books from publishers overseas uncompetitive to sell in the US.
> 
> However, the under 500 gms postage is $14.10, which, although the overseas
> publisher is losing $11.11 per book, makes sales possible. Hence the
> re-typesetting.
> 
> Amazon could simply arrange that all postage is at cost from anywhere in the
> world. It could use the same web software for this that publishers use.  In
> fact, Amazon does this for books sold outside the US.  For books sold inside
> the US, however, Amazon chooses to have a fixed price for postage. 
> 
> This means American publishers benefit at the expense of overseas
> publishers. 
> 
> The resulting design outcome of  Amazon's position is globally
> anti-competitive. It acts as a protectionist policy in favour of US
> specialist publishers and against similar overseas publishers.
> 
> The above Amazon protectionism is  also supported by the general US design
> of processes for anti-terrorism security that cost overseas publishers
> significantly in time and effort compared to publishers within the US.
> 
> You could regard the above as examples of  political design. In depth, the
> issue might make an interesting design case study. There are two reasons:
> the political global anti-competitive dimension;, and the  idea of using
> design activity in one realm (in this case publishing) to respond to
> oppressive pressures brought to bear via design of processes in another
> realm (in this case book distribution and sales).
> 
> From here, however, redesigning to reduce book weight is easier than
> changing American or Amazon globalisation policies!
> 
> My interest is in whether there is formal research analysis and evidence
> offering particular design guidance over and above the conventions of
> typesetting design practices. I'd be particularly interested in research
> analyses relating to ratios (margins, gutters, font size, x-height, leading,
> inter-paragraph spacing etc) in double column layouts for maximising
> readability.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Terry
> 
> ---
> Dr Terence Love
> PhD(UWA), BA(Hons) Engin. PGCEd, FDRS, AMIMechE, MISI
> Director,
> Love Services Pty Ltd
> PO Box 226, Quinns Rocks
> Western Australia 6030
> Tel: +61 (0)4 3497 5848
> Fax:+61 (0)8 9305 7629
> [log in to unmask] 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gunnar Swanson
> Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2014 11:35 PM
> To: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related
> research in Design
> Subject: Re: Request - resources on double column setting of books
> 
> On Nov 27, 2014, at 9:25 AM, Terence Love <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> I'm looking for good info on setting books in double column.
>> 
>> I know many of the usual multi-column conventions (min 35-40  
>> characters, column width in picas > point size etc)
>> 
>> I'm having difficulty finding any good research on readability and the 
>> like of double column setting for books (other than bibles) .
> 
> Terry,
> 
> What question do you have about two-column layouts in books that you hope
> someone has answered? 
> 
> I can't think of any specific references but I'm suspicious of typographic
> rules (as opposed to typographic rules of thumb) anyway. There are a lot of
> variables and they are interconnected enough that studying any single aspect
> is much more difficult than most researchers on type and reading seem to
> want to admit. 
> 
> The sort of material and reading affects page size. The sort of audience and
> assumed reading conditions affect type size. The choice of typeface affects
> type size and set width. The set width affects optimal column width. Optimal
> column width and page size affect the number of columns. . .
> 
> Reader (and publisher) expectations affect choices. Books that tend to be
> larger and more complex (cookbooks, textbooks, etc.) commonly have multiple
> columns. Smaller books (novels, etc.) tend not to. The size of book is
> affected by the size of press sheets and presses, the budget, etc. but also
> by assumptions about how the book will be used. (Novels tend to be held
> fairly closely, cookbooks tend to be looked at from a distance when
> preparing food, travel guides need to be carried around, etc.) A reader of a
> novel might find a two column layout to be odd this disconcerting but I
> suspect that would wear off after a couple of pages of reading.
> 
> Even the nature of the the writing affects choices. Shorter sentences and
> quicker reading seem to work well with shorter measures. The narrow columns
> of a newspaper would be distracting for writing that has longer sentences.
> Longer words would also mean that narrower columns would be difficult to
> justify. In the case of flush left settings, narrower columns combined with
> longer words make distractingly irregular rags. (Choices about hyphenation
> also affect such decisions.)
> 
> That adds up to many books having a wider column than is optimal for the
> type size. The standard fix for that is additional leading since the
> discomfort of reading long line length is the chance of skipping or doubling
> lines; because the eye has to skip back a greater horizontal distance,
> adding a greater vertical element makes getting lost less likely. (I don't
> know that I've seen research confirming that and typographic wisdom is chock
> full of specious folklore but I'll stand by that one.) Since more leading
> means more pages for the same text, that solution often gets rejected along
> with the wider margins that would have given a smaller measure, visual
> relief, and a good place to grab the book.
> 
> Even if you follow a bunch of rules, trying variations and testing them by
> having them read by representatives of the target audience under realistic
> conditions will be worthwhile. A lot of people have tried to systematize
> knowledge to avoid trial-and-error and subjectivity but, at least so far,
> they have failed.
> 
> But now I am curious: What question do you have about two-column layouts in
> books that you hope someone has answered? 
> 
> 
> Gunnar
> 
> Gunnar Swanson
> East Carolina University
> graphic design program
> 
> http://www.ecu.edu/cs-cfac/soad/graphic/index.cfm
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> Gunnar Swanson Design Office
> 1901 East 6th Street
> Greenville NC 27858
> USA
> 
> http://www.gunnarswanson.com
> [log in to unmask]
> +1 252 258-7006
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD
> studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager