It's all relative, but in a world where lots of organisations are yet to
set up Google Places
http://www.google.com/business/placesforbusiness/free-features/ and too
many venues hide their address on a 'contact us'/'visiting us' page,
there's still a lot of low-hanging fruit.
But on the positive side, cultural organisations don't seem to fall into
the trap of putting their address up as an image rather than text, unlike
many restaurants and pubs!
Cheers, Mia
--------------------------------------------
http://openobjects.org.uk/
http://twitter.com/mia_out
I mostly use this address for list mail; my open.ac.uk address is checked
daily
On 11 June 2014 15:44, Owen Stephens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I don't disagree but I'm not completely sure that marking up venue info
> will give the most immediate benefit (e.g. maybe venue information already
> does pretty well in SEO terms and marking up Events might give more
> immediate impact and be just as straightforward?)
>
> Owen Stephens
> Owen Stephens Consulting
> Web: http://www.ostephens.com
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Telephone: 0121 288 6936
>
> On 11 Jun 2014, at 15:41, Mia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Just a quick note to say that keeping the areas separate is key in
> avoiding
> > confusion (and it's even harder in 140 characters on twitter).
> >
> > I think marking up Venues is a quick win and most of what museums need is
> > already in schema.
> >
> > Collections are currently harder, and the benefits are less clear
> compared
> > to an API or data download, but including schema markup in online
> > collections interfaces isn't that hard (it's just markup). Working out
> how
> > to markup and how is where I'm going to hand over to people with more
> > time...
> >
> > Cheers, Mia
> >
> > --------------------------------------------
> > http://openobjects.org.uk/
> > http://twitter.com/mia_out
> > I mostly use this address for list mail; my open.ac.uk address is
> checked
> > daily
> >
> >
> > On 11 June 2014 14:18, Owen Stephens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 to Mia and Mike's comments
> >>
> >> I think for each of the areas you outline in the post (Venue,
> >> Services/Facilities, Collections Information) we could try to answer the
> >> questions:
> >>
> >> 1) Can this be done with schema.org as it is, and if so what does it
> look
> >> like (example markup)?
> >> 2) What cannot be done with schema.org and why (i.e. what is missing)?
> >> 3) What is the likely impact of adding the markup in terms of immediate
> >> benefit?
> >> 4) If the answers 1-3 suggest there would be benefit to extending
> >> schema.org to cater for some museum information, then how should this
> be
> >> done?
> >>
> >> 1) and 3) are basically - what can we do now and what would be the
> benefit
> >> 2) and 4) are basically - what might we do in the future and how do we
> get
> >> there
> >>
> >> To share some experience from libraries, there has been some work on 2
> and
> >> 4 for libraries through the 'Schema Bib Extend Community Group'
> >> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Main_Page - which has led
> to
> >> some proposals to add new elements to schema.org via the W3C public
> >> vocabs list (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/) - and
> >> has influenced the development of schema.org
> >>
> >> However I think what this activity has missed (IMO) is the more
> immediate
> >> benefits that might be realised - which is why I want to emphasis Qs 1&
> 3
> >> here
> >>
> >> Owen
> >>
> >>
> >> Owen Stephens
> >> Owen Stephens Consulting
> >> Web: http://www.ostephens.com
> >> Email: [log in to unmask]
> >> Telephone: 0121 288 6936
> >>
> >> On 11 Jun 2014, at 13:49, Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Great post, Nick - thanks for that.
> >>>
> >>> Also interesting to see Richard's response [ also a side of me slightly
> >> shocked to see his non-friendly querystring-based URL's ;-) ]
> >>>
> >>> Personally I'm with Mia's thoughts in her earlier MCG mail about not
> >> allowing it to get too formal or over-complex. The whole point of
> schema is
> >> that it's a bit of a JFDI activity, and if we allow ourselves to get
> >> tangled then we'll just lose the opportunity to make a quickish dent.
> >>>
> >>> Also: I'm totally with the thinking about this being a simple route to
> >> machine readable data - but really we should be clear that a large
> chunk of
> >> the benefit is about increasing click-throughs from Google results, and
> SEO
> >> in general. That's - hopefully - the immediate impact that people might
> see.
> >>>
> >>> (Blurb about rich snippets increasing CTR:
> >>
> https://www.google.com/?q=rich%20snippet%20ctr#q=rich+snippet+ctr&safe=off
> >> )
> >>>
> >>> cheers
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _____________________________
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Mike Ellis *
> >>>
> >>> Thirty8 Digital: a small but perfectly formed digital agency:
> >> http://thirty8.co.uk <http://thirty8.co.uk/>
> >>>
> >>> * My book: http://heritageweb.co.uk <http://heritageweb.co.uk/> *
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Nick Poole <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> >>>> 11 June 2014 12:23
> >>>> Dear MCG'ers,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Further to the discussions over the past few days about the potential
> >> to use Schema.org to promote greater discovery and use of museum data, I
> >> have blogged my understanding of the potential approach and its
> benefits at:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://www.collectionslink.org.uk/blog/2198-a-simple-way-to-promote-your-museum-online
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I would really welcome comments from the MCG community about this
> >> approach. We are proposing to use part of the SPECTRUM Community
> meeting at
> >> the OpenCulture conference on the 24th June (Kia Oval, Vauxhall,
> London) to
> >> discuss the merits of the idea and to gauge the appetite for developing
> a
> >> simple pilot using Schema.org to see how it works.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In case you haven't already registered, the full OpenCulture
> conference
> >> includes strands on 'Digital Skills' and 'Informatics Skills' which
> include
> >> presentations around opening up museum data for discovery and use.
> Places
> >> are going fast this week, so please do book early at
> >> http://www.collectionslink.org.uk/registration (note that we're
> offering
> >> discounted rates for museums with an annual budget of less than £500k).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Finally, Richard Light has posted a really useful response to my blog
> >> and this discussion at http://light.demon.co.uk/wordpress/?p=859.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Looking forward to your thoughts!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> All best,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Nick
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Nick Poole
> >>>> Chief Executive Officer
> >>>> Collections Trust
> >>>>
> >>>> <http://www.openculture2014.org.uk/>
> >>>>
> >>>> Join the Collections Trust's Collections Management LinkedIn group <
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=3280471&trk=my_groups-b-grp-v> -
> 7300
> >> collections professionals worldwide!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> New! Join the Collections Trust's Digital Asset Management subgroup <
> >>
> https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=7418643&trk=groups%2Fmost_recent-r-subgr-subgrpname&goback=%2Egmr_3280471
> >
> >> - insight, discussions and expertise about Digital Asset Management in
> >> Museums!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Follow us on twitter: http://www.twitter.com/collectiontrust <
> >> http://www.twitter.com/collectiontrust>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Visit Collections Trust online
> >>>>
> >>>> www.collectionstrust.org.uk <http://www.collectionstrust.org.uk/>
> >>>>
> >>>> www.collectionslink.org.uk <http://www.collectionslink.org.uk/>
> >>>>
> >>>> www.culturegrid.org.uk <http://www.culturegrid.org.uk/>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Company Registration No: 1300565 Registered Charity No: 273984
> >>>>
> >>>> Registered Office: Collections Trust, WC 209, Natural History Museum,
> >> Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ****************************************************************
> >>>> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> >>>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> >>>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> >>>> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> >>>> ****************************************************************
> >>>
> >>> ****************************************************************
> >>> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> >>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> >>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> >>> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> >>> ****************************************************************
> >>
> >> ****************************************************************
> >> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> >> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> >> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> >> ****************************************************************
> >>
> >
> > ****************************************************************
> > website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> > Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> > [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> > ****************************************************************
>
>
> ****************************************************************
> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************
>
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|