Hi Stephanie,
Ah, thanks. I was working off memory and its way back there in the boondocks.
Did you manage to find an electronic copy of the full evaluation report? If so, I'd welcome a pointer. The only thing I could find on the web was Grintner's commentary on it from 1956.
Cheers,
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of stefanie di russo
Sent: Monday, 12 May 2014 1:08 PM
To: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subject: Re: First Use of the Term "Design Thinking"
Hi Terry,
I have searched the reference you provided to Heico and there is no explicit comment or reference to the exact term 'design thinking' or 'engineering design thinking'. There is, however, many references to creative thinking, imaginative thinking and analytical thinking.
Best,
-stefanie
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Terence Love <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Heico,
> Wondering, did you check 'engineering design thinking' in American
> Society for Engineering Education (1955) Report on Evaluation of
> Engineering Education, 1952-55 (Washington, DC: ASEE)?
> Best regards,
> Terry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Heico Wesselius
> Sent: Monday, 12 May 2014 11:59 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc: Heico Wesselius
> Subject: Re: First Use of the Term "Design Thinking"
>
> Hi, Soren,
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> There has been some debate about this in recent posts. Some of the
> entries on the web are incorrect or incomplete.
>
> I even went back to the earlier work of Van Doren [1940] who captured
> some aspects of the design thinking concept, but never actually uses the term.
> It is as we know a distinct term.
>
> In his book Industrial Design: A Practical Guide to Product Design and
> Development (1940) he highlighted some of the trades of a good
> designer. He continues by saying that it is the profession of the
> industrial designer to give meaningful forms to objects, but more
> importantly to have the consumer want to own a product. The book is
> more aligned with thinking of styling, some thinking about manufacturing and thinking of sales and marketing.
>
> I would be interested in the scientific paper that you describe.
>
> Yours,
>
> Heico
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD
> studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD
> studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
*Stefanie Di Russo*
PhD Student
Faculty of Design
Swinburne University
*twitter:* @stefdirusso <https://twitter.com/#!/stefdirusso>
*linkedin: public
*profile<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/stefanie-di-russo/35/16/a84>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|