Dear Alex,
I think you need to be careful in carrying out such qualitative research; for example could you clarify what you mean by 'Appropriate'? You also need to be careful about promising anonymity when respondees are sending emails to a public authority's address.
I look forward to seeing what you come up with but do caution about how you will interpret your results.
Regards,
Paul Nathanail
-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alex Grimmer
Sent: 16 May 2014 13:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: C4SL Straw Poll
Dear All
I have been reading with great interest the conversations regarding the new C4SLs. I thought it would be a good idea to get a general feel as to the overall opinion of them. Therefore I propose a straw poll on the following questions (Yes/No answers only please).
1. Do you think that the C4SLs are appropriate for use as part of Part 2A?
2. Do you think that the C4SLs are appropriate for use as part of planning?
If you would also like to indicate if you are a consultant of a member of a LA that would be appreciated.
I will collate that data and pass it back to the group. All responses will be completely confidential and I will only issue the numbers etc. If I could have all responses by the 30th May, I will then post the results the following week.
Regards
Alex Grimmer
|