Hi Martin
If you haven’t try bedpostx before, it will probably make your life easier to try it first on some standard data of more typical spatial and angular resolution.
Cheers
Stam
On 12 Mar 2014, at 13:35, Martin Luessi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Moises, Stam,
>
> Thanks a lot. It seems to be working with the suggested parameters. I
> plan to run it on a GPU cluster; I had added the -c flag because I
> thought it may be easier to get it to work on the CPU first.
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
>
> On 03/12/14 05:59, Stamatios Sotiropoulos wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> Just to add to Moises recommendation, bedpostx on HCP data can take many hours, even on a cluster. We use the recent GPU version of bedpostx for the HCP data on a GPU cluster that allows accelerations of two orders of magnitude.
>>
>> http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0061892
>>
>> Cheers
>> Stam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 Mar 2014, at 21:48, Moises Hernandez Fernandez <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> could you try to change the way you set the parameters ?
>>>
>>> bedpostx /hcp_data/100307/T1w/Diffusion -n 3 -b 1000 -model 2 -w 1 -g -c
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Moises
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
|