Hi Mark
How about
What's the problem we're trying to address?
Why do we think the proposed intervention will be a solution?
In an ideal world, how is it supposed to work?
Of course those questions are the tip of the iceberg...
Best wishes
Janet
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10 Mar 2014, at 12:12, Mark Pearson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> My experience is that as realist approaches make their way into the mainstream they are increasingly being called upon as components of wider research projects. This means working with a range of people who have more or less (probably less) of an understanding of realism and putting it into practice. It also often means that assumptions about the world are merrily skirted over in the hubbub of getting a project up-and-running, only to awkwardly pop up later on.
>
> So - What questions would you ask at the start of a project to throw light on people’s assumptions about how the world ‘works’ and what it means for how we research it? (this is my effort at asking a question about ontology, which I’m taking here to mean ‘how the world must be in order for knowledge to exist’)
>
> I’m not searching for a comprehensive list of questions, but perhaps a distillation of 2-3 key questions to start the conversation?
>
> Mark
>
> Mark Pearson PhD
> Senior Research Fellow
> Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG)
> University of Exeter Medical School
> E: [log in to unmask]
> T: 0044 (0) 1392 726079
> http://medicine.exeter.ac.uk/about/profiles/index.php?web_id=Mark_Pearson
|