JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives


LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives

LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives


LIS-PUB-LIBS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PUB-LIBS Home

LIS-PUB-LIBS Home

LIS-PUB-LIBS  July 2013

LIS-PUB-LIBS July 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Council services cheaper online...

From:

"Wylie, Alan" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Wylie, Alan

Date:

Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:07:36 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (253 lines)

I agree it is a dangerous road to go down, and your hellish vision of a 'subsumed' library service is not that unlikely if we continue at a pace down the co-located, shared service and 'hub/one stop shop' route. The other related concern that I have is the creation of premium services within libraries, basically if you have the money you get it quicker, surely this raises professional and ethical concerns?

Alan Wylie
Librarian
Islington Central Reference Library
2 Fieldway Crescent
London Borough of Islington
N5 1PF
0207 527 6931
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Clark, Ian ([log in to unmask])
Sent: 18 July 2013 13:15
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Council services cheaper online...

Agree entirely...as you know, banging on about the digital divide is one of my favourite hobbies! Though I wish I didn't have cause to. In this particular case was intrigued by the idea that a council service, funded by all local tax payers, was making discounts accessible to some but not others. I sort of expect this from utility providers etc (although I also think that is unfair), but find it a bit odd in terms of a council discriminating between different types of taxpayer. Seems to me to be a dangerous road to go down...if indeed that is what is suggested here which I may not have understood correctly (or, has been reported in a misleading way...which I would like to think obviously, but perhaps not!).



I do also worry about the way technology is being incorporated into the service (whilst agreeing that the tech is not itself the 'villain')...seems we will very soon be in a situation where libraries are a public service point for the council, with books and other library services as a minor sideline (how long before the library aspect is subsumed altogether and if you want a book you have to download or order it from the council website, in the 'council hub' or from home?). Probably a bit too bleak and unlikely, but still...



Ian Clark

Library Systems Officer,

Augustine House,

Canterbury Christ Church University



Tel: 01227 767700 ext 3141



Follow us on Twitter: @ccculibrary



From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mick Fortune
Sent: 18 July 2013 12:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Council services cheaper online...



Regardless of the type of bill being paid isn't the real point internet access?



If you're currently relying on using a public library to get online you are going to be severely disadvantaged when that library disappears. Paying your bills - whether council or otherwise - will be just one way in which you will find life getting tougher.



The disconnect here is between a government that chooses to view public libraries as the safety net for those who aren't online and local authorities who view that same service as an optional extra. The government chooses to believe that online access to services is being brokered by the local authorities. The LAs often see that as something their constituents should provide for themselves. Those who aren't online are becoming invisible in an increasingly "digital by default" society.



In my world (RFID and LMS) the trend is for equipment suppliers to focus on increasing the scope of the services they offer local authorities to be delivered via library-based devices. Privateers (sorry - clearly I meant "privatisers") like Laing have been particularly eager to use devices (in Hounslow for example), originally intended to manage self-service loans and returns for the library, to deliver other council services - it's this "added value" that councillors find so attractive. As the libraries close down these devices may of course end up being used in other public spaces to perform what was originally a secondary function in the library - paid for by cutting the book fund.



Ironic doesn't come close.



This shouldn't really come as a surprise to anyone. Former SCL chair Nicky Parker warned a roads how I attended in Manchester over two years ago that librarians would increasingly find themselves helping the public pay their parking fines rather than finding books.



I would expect that plans are already in place to allow such devices to handle other payments - like utility bills. It makes perfect sense from the point of view of cash strapped LA executives and would certainly be supported by the government as being 'innovative'.



I think it would be wrong to view the technology as the villain in this piece though. The argument isn't really about the technology, it's about whether we care about those that can't use it or not - and what we do about that.



I think Dame Joan's wider point is essentially that if you can't get online you will be punished.



But public librarians know that already don't they?



Mick



m. +44 (0)7786 625544 <tel:%2B44%20%280%297786%20625544> t. +33 555 61 03 71 e. [log in to unmask]

@mickfortune <http://twitter.com/mickfortune>



From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Clark, Ian ([log in to unmask])
Sent: 18 July 2013 12:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Council services cheaper online...



I did wonder that too, but the title ("Older people 'penalised' by cheaper online council bills, warns peer") suggests it is council services, as does this extract from the article:



Baroness Bakewell, a Labour peer, said more and more councils were "going online" at the expense of their older residents.



"In fact, they are offering a bribe-a reduction for people who pay their bills online-thus penalising the millions of older people who are not willing or able to go online themselves," she said.



It's the bit where she says councils are 'offering a bribe' that gets me...if it is utility companies offering a discount, surely that has nothing to do with councils and therefore cannot be described as councils 'offering a bribe'. Or am I completely mis-reading this?



Ian Clark

Library Systems Officer,

Augustine House,

Canterbury Christ Church University



Tel: 01227 767700 ext 3141



Follow us on Twitter: @ccculibrary



From: Mobeena Khan [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 18 July 2013 11:01
To: Clark, Ian ([log in to unmask]); [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: Council services cheaper online...



I think this might be more in reference to utiltiy companies charging extra if you pay in cash at the Post Office or send a cheque in rather than doing it online or by DD. Could that be the case rather than discounted services?



Mobeena



Mobeena Khan

Stock and Reader Development Librarian

West Area, Watford Central Library



Libraries, Culture and Learning

Health and Community Services

Hertfordshire County Council



Hempstead Road, Watford, Herts, WD17 3EU



01923 336480 Comet/Internal Number: 29480

Mobile Phone Number: 07932 717910



Working days - Wednesday, Thursday and Friday



Follow Hertfordshire Libraries on Twitter <https://twitter.com/HertsLibraries> Find us on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/hertslibraries>





From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Clark, Ian ([log in to unmask])
Sent: 18 July 2013 09:28
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Council services cheaper online...



Hi,



This might not be quite the place for this, but it does touch on an area that affects public libraries so thought I'd post it here.



I noticed a report on publicservice.co.uk quoting Baroness Bakewell as saying that councils are...



"offering a bribe-a reduction for people who pay their bills online-thus penalising the millions of older people who are not willing or able to go online themselves."

[Source: http://www.publicservice.co.uk/news_story.asp?id=23467]



Is anyone aware of councils offering discounts if people pay for council services online? If they are, I wonder where this leaves those who do not have internet access, particularly if their local library is closed...



Thanks,



Ian Clark

Library Systems Officer,

Augustine House,

Canterbury Christ Church University



Tel: 01227 767700 ext 3141



Follow us on Twitter: @ccculibrary







****Disclaimer****

The information in this message should be regarded as confidential and is intended for the addressee only unless explicitly stated. If you have received this message in error it must be deleted and the sender notified. The views expressed in this message are personal and not necessarily those of Hertfordshire County Council unless explicitly stated. Please be aware that emails sent to or received from Hertfordshire County Council may be intercepted and read by the council. Interception will only occur to ensure compliance with council policies or procedures or regulatory obligations, to prevent or deter crime, or for the purposes of essential maintenance or support of the email system.

This e-mail is intended for the addressee only. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer. Please be aware that information in this email may be confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright protected.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager