Dear Lily,
Practices probably differ from discipline to discipline, for example, anthropology or history as contrasted with art history, geography, or sociology. Copyright issues should not differ ... These are defined by law. With respect to captioned and credit, most journals use the major styles defined by MLA, APA, or Chicago, and these manuals don't state clearly how to dal with the issue of photographs by the authors of an article. I would say that the best strategy is to prepare to provide all infection while blinding it for review. Then, as Klaus suggests, ask the journal editor how specifically to proceed.
You can never go wrong providing all information with care.
Y ours,
Ken
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 07:11:36 +0000, Diaz-Kommonen Lily <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Dear Ken and Klaus (as well as others),
>
>Thank you for your concise answers in helping to illuminate these issues.
>
>I cannot help but wonder whether there would be a difference in how photographs are used to support knowledge claims in different disciplines. Would there be a difference between how photographs are used in a design publication and how they are used in a computer science article? I mention this latter as a practitioner of new media and in the light of the close relationship between this field and computer science.
>
>It seems to me that in computer science related publications, the role of the photograph is primarily to bear witness or serve as evidence to claims being made in the articles whereas in design the photograph itself might encapsulate some of the knowledge already�
>
>Any thoughts? (This might be turning into another thread altogether.)
>
>BR. Lily
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|