Dear Ken and David
For some of us not familiar with your respective views and perspectives,
would you please at least give us the essence - not taking a lifetime !! -
of your differing arguments? So we each can make our own judgement and
opinion.
Regards
Francois
Montreal
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> Thanks for your note. There is little to add to your reply: “I disagree
> with you profoundly and in so many ways that it would take a lifetime of
> responses to this list to even scratch the surface. Life is too short. …
> It's probably better to simply regard my comments as provocations,
> invitations to reflect rather than opportunities to attack and dismiss.”
>
> As you saw from the care I gave to my reply, I neither attacked you nor
> dismissed your views. My reply was a respectful disagreement.
>
> It seemed to me that people who linked to your blog might wish to read the
> report for themselves or review the conference archive. Everyone can make
> up his or her own mind on what they mean or add up to.
>
> For now, I acknowledge the fact that you disagree with me and leave it at
> that.
>
> Warm wishes,
>
> Ken
>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|