Dear SPM/FSL users,
It seems that there are several templates (SPM v FSL) as well as
different normalization routines that could result in slight
variations of the localization of the results. Do I need to worry
about these small differences between methods?
In particular, I want to know if I can take regions defined in a study
using FLIRT in FSL and use them in my study that has been processed
with SPM's non-linear normalization tool. Can I use them as is or is
there a transform that can I compute and/or apply to the ROIs to get
them into the SPM normalized space.
Thank you in advance for your input.
Best Regards, Donald McLaren
=================
D.G. McLaren, Ph.D.
Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and
Harvard Medical School
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA
Website: http://www.martinos.org/~mclaren
Office: (773) 406-2464
=====================
This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED
HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773)
406-2464 or email.
|