JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for STAFF-DEVELOPMENT Archives


STAFF-DEVELOPMENT Archives

STAFF-DEVELOPMENT Archives


STAFF-DEVELOPMENT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

STAFF-DEVELOPMENT Home

STAFF-DEVELOPMENT Home

STAFF-DEVELOPMENT  November 2012

STAFF-DEVELOPMENT November 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Random Thought: LED, II

From:

"Louis E. Schmier" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Louis E. Schmier

Date:

Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:42:56 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

	I wasn't planning on this, but the heavy rains came.  A verbal nor'easter.  Torrents of unexpected flooding off-line e-sneers, e-rejections, e-flames, e-jeers, e-giggles, e-sarcasms, e-snides.  But, I won't let them inundate or sweep me away.  As I once said, touchy?  Sure.  I struggle to reach out and touch a student in need to make a positive difference.  Feely?  Of course.  I get to know and feel who each student is, what is going on inside her or him, what is going on outside the classroom with her or him, and I am empathetic and then sympathetic.  Dreamy?  Of course.  But, as I tell the students, dreams work out only if you work hard at them.  Fuzzy?  Heck, no!  I see very clearly; I listen sharply.  



	This acid rain of disparaging remarks is seeded by a negative "perception bias" held by too many academics, that has led to a lot of "attribution error."  Too many academics live in an alternative reality.  Too often, far too often, they're blinded by their own self-interest to swell their resumes, cowed by their quest for tenure, promotion, and/or position, and swayed by their belief that their fake world of Taylor and Skinner actually exists.  That is, they find and point out only that which creates the illusion that their myths are reality; that reinforces, validates, and proves the accuracy of their preconceptions, assumptions, presumptions.  But, why is it only okay to express negative emotions such as resignation, frustration, disappointment, and even anger under the aegis of being objective?  



	Oh, I see, it's okay to claim with misguided pride that your intent is to weed out the myriad of "don't belongs," to separate the lethargic chafe from the self-motivating wheat, to send all those inept and unprepared "they're letting anyone ins" packing.  It's okay to condemn students because in their world, students by nature dislike work, refuse to assume responsibility, want to be told what to do, and have to be threatened and controlled before they'll do anything.  But, identify yourself as a nurturer, and you're condemned as a hapless romantic, a starry-eyed dreamer.  Mention "love," and the place goes ballistic as if you've uttered a satanic incantation that threatens to destroy the Ivory Tower.  Why the sarcastic giggles when you say we academics are in the business of saving and transforming lives as much as, if not far more, than merely transmitting information, most of which will be soon obsolete?  Why the sneering faces when you say our mission is to help students beat the odds rather than to beat them down?  Why the nasty comments when you say our task to help students learn to deal with stress and pressure rather than to pressure them.  Why the "its not my job" flaming when you say you should be there for any student to turn to rather than turning away and turning out the many students who don't fit your prejudiced image?  Why the jeering laughs when you say our job is to strengthen a student's sense of belonging, self-esteem, self-respect, and self-confidence rather than brand and treat them demeaningly as "don't belongs?"  Why the snide comments when you say you should have a special place in your heart for each and every student rather than bidding them good riddance as "non-performers" and "non-achievers?"  Why is to curse more acceptable than to bless, to be cold than to be warm, to be distant than close, to be objectively aloof than subjectively involved, to be bored with than excited by, to be callous than to be empathetic, to be a "ho hum" than to be a "wow," to be disinterested than to be interested, to be apathetic than to love?  

But, too many of us, far too many, with too much detached arrogance and self-righteousness, with a "grandiloquence," don't cop to all this.  Too many prefer the comfort and safety and convenience of having students follow our often harsh, commanding, and often threatening orders to the anxiety of standing back and granting them autonomy and ownership. 



	Let me give you something to think about, to think about slowly.  You do know that we're not making ourselves feel better when we practice forms of disengagement, don't you?  The devil's not doing it; the students aren't doing it; the administrators aren't doing it; we are doing it, to ourselves!  The research done by the likes of Julius Segal, Roy Baumeister, and a host of others, shows that when people are excluded, disconnected, ignored, and rejected, everything and everyone suffers.  That includes us, the classroom perpetrators!  We victimize ourselves!  We feel just as miserable making students feel miserable as the students feel miserable.  Interesting, isn't it.  Think about it.  I'll repeat that because it's worth driving home the point.  The form of separation, selecting out, distancing, the threatening carrot and stick approach so many of us practice in the classroom not only makes the students miserable, it makes us, we who are doing the disconnecting and chilling, miserable as well.  That's why we feel the less that than happy frustration, resignation, and/or any other negative emotion. And some of us wonder why so many academics seek satisfaction in the lab and archive?   Our brains are no different than those of the students.  These researchers, and other "brainologists," also found that such exclusion and disconnection triggers the brain's dorsal lateral cortex.  That's the same areas of the brain that are active when people feel physical pain.  Similar parts of the brain and often in similar ways process emotional and physical pain. Hence, the joylessness of teaching and the enjoyment of research.



	We human beings are extremely sensitive to being socially rejected. Being connected and belonging is a powerful human survival mechanism against being prey.  It's so powerful that the stronger the feelings of being unnoticed, unworthy, unwanted, disconnected, the greater the need for acceptance.  I read about it every day in student journals and faculty e-mails; I see it everyday around me; I hear it everyday in conversations with students and colleagues, as well as at conferences.  When we professors don't feel connected in the classroom, we find safe, secure, comfortable connections outside the classroom.  That's why social and professional networking in our disciplines are so important to us and why we will devalue the classroom.  When students feel alone, when they feel a strangerness, when they feel a loneliness, they feel lost, abandoned, scared, and downright unhappy.  They find, too, find joyful outlets outside the classroom.  They will do quirky things; they will abandon self-discipline, self-control, self-respect, self-esteem, self-confidence.  Why do you think "thirsty Thursdays" at the local bars are so popular?  Why do you think being socially "single" is so fearful?  Why do you think the siren of sororities and fraternities, or playing team sports, or participating in a theater troupe or band at any cost is so powerful a lure, even if it means crashing on academic rocks?  



	It's not a matter of adapting to the new reality, but to the always reality, and abandoning the too often present and influential alternative reality.  Now, let me give you something else to think about, to think about slowly.  Just think what might have a chance of happening if while we want to raise the learning bar, they raise the loving bar.  Just think what might have a chance of happening if we broke down separating barriers, built bridges, and forged community in our classrooms and on our campuses.  Just think what might have a chance of happening if we took and lived my Teacher's Oath.  Students gather strength, confidence, self-esteem from those Segal called "charismatic" people, from those who are unconditionally in each student's corner, from those who are un-surrendering advocates for each student, from those who connect with students without any strings attached.   You think healthy connectedness and compassion are not the seeds for emotional, physical, and mental well being, for achievement, for success?  



	Doggone, it's not just the students.  It's each of us as well.  Have we forgotten?  We're people, too.  We all needed and still need such charismatic people in our lives.  We all have had such people in our lives.  We all need uplifting relationships and supportive connections, and encouraging community.  Not only do we need them, we need to be them for others.  Didn't you have someone in your life to whom you owe a deep appreciation for influencing you and having an impact personally and professionally?  I did.  Professionally, he was Dr. Birdsal Viault, a young history professor fresh out of Duke at Adelphi College.  He took me under his wing at a time I had a broken wing.  He set me on my course as a time I was adrift.  He convinced me I could soar at a time I felt grounded.  Personally, it was and continually is my Susie, and I'll leave that at that.  



	So, do you think students today are any different?  They are not!   Maybe we've become different, and indifferent.  Do you think students today have changed from the time we were students.  They haven't.  Maybe it's we who have changed.  Think students are lazier today than yesteryear?  No.  Maybe it's we who don't want to work unless threatened or rewarded.  Maybe it's we who are amnesiacs who have forgotten what it was like to be a student.  I say this:  students today, no less than students yesterday,  have to walk with the unconditional and persevering--uncondtional and persevering--nurturing believers and faithful, with the uplifters and energizers, with the dreamers and doers, with the encouragers and supporters, with the kindly and caring, with the smilers and the hopeful, with the inspirers and igniters, with the risk takers and fearless, with the committed and dedicated, and above all, with the lovers. 



Make it a good day



-Louis-





Louis Schmier                         		http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org       

Department of History                        http://www.therandomthoughts.com

Valdosta State University 

Valdosta, Georgia 31698                     /\   /\  /\                 /\     /\

(O)  229-333-5947                            /^\\/  \/   \   /\/\__   /   \  /   \

(C)  229-630-0821                           /     \/   \_ \/ /   \/ /\/  /  \    /\  \

                                                    //\/\/ /\    \__/__/_/\_\/    \_/__\  \

                                              /\"If you want to climb mountains,\ /\

                                          _ /  \    don't practice on mole hills" - /   \_



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2023
August 2023
April 2023
March 2023
November 2022
October 2022
August 2022
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
May 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager