As stated, it is running and there are no errors. Running it by hand
makes no difference.
Cheers,
Daniela
On 3 October 2012 12:31, Jens Jensen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Guessing: fetch-crl is not running on the hosts without CRLs? Or it has
> a problem of some sort? Could you run fetch-crl by hand?
>
> -j
>
> On 03/10/2012 11:28, Daniela Bauer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I came across this yesterday, but I haven't been able to come up with
>> an explanation:
>>
>> Why do some certificates (for lack of a better word) come without
>> revocation lists ? (No obvious errors in fetch-crl.)
>>
>> And how can it be that for some certificates I (and not just me...)
>> have no revocation lists on almost all of my machines, *except* my
>> EMI2 CE ?
>>
>> e.g. EMI1
>>
>> [root@ceprod05 certificates]# ls -l 58b08*
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Sep 26 05:22 58b08cb5.0 -> MYIFAM.pem
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Sep 26 05:22 58b08cb5.namespaces -> MYIFAM.namespaces
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Sep 26 05:22 58b08cb5.signing_policy ->
>> MYIFAM.signing_policy
>>
>> EMI2:
>> [root@ceprod08 certificates]# ls -l 58b08*
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Sep 25 12:08 58b08cb5.0 -> MYIFAM.pem
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 Sep 25 12:08 58b08cb5.namespaces ->
>> MYIFAM.namespaces
>> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1258 Oct 3 06:45 58b08cb5.r0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 21 Sep 25 12:08 58b08cb5.signing_policy ->
>> MYIFAM.signing_policy
>>
>>
>> Note that both directories contain plenty of fresh revocation lists
>> and are both up to version 1.50-1
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniela
>>
>
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
--
Sent from the pit of despair
-----------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask]
HEP Group/Physics Dep
Imperial College
Tel: +44-(0)20-75947810
http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~dbauer/
|