On 27/03/12 16:30, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> Lhcb said last July they wanted cvmfs and that's why in the atlas cvmfs
> page I put also lhcb instructions. They didn't push loudly in the UK
> because we were already moving.
>
What's the current status of ATLAS, LHCb and CMS.
AIUI, all the ATLAS sites have converted - and probably all the UK sites
that support ATLAS.
Chris
> cheers
> alessandra
>
> On 27/03/2012 15:23, Sam Skipsey wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I think I gave my small points earlier in that thread.
>>
>> Basically, though, fairly straightforward; after the initial slow
>> start identifying the initial corruption issue, support has been
>> responsive, rapid and effective.
>>
>> Also, it helped with LHCb (despite their not actually telling people
>> to use it until just now) as much as ATLAS.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On 27 March 2012 15:21, Christopher J. Walker <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> I've volunteered to give a brief talk on CVMFS experience in the UK.
>>
>> I'm in the process of updating the talk I gave at hepsysman in BHAM.
>>
>> Steve Traylan wants info on:
>>
>> On 26/03/12 17:18, Steve Traylen wrote:
>>
>> >> > I guess the practical application/problems / scale/
>> difficulty ,
>>
>> easyness to deploy.
>>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Problems you anticipate,
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I guess the message from the whole session is
>> proposing that cvmfs is
>>
>> good for other
>>
>> >> >
>>
>>
>> So if anyone has anything useful to add, I need it ASAP - the talk
>> is tomorrow morning.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>
|