 |
 |
On 27/03/12 16:30, Alessandra Forti wrote: > Hi Sam, > > Lhcb said last July they wanted cvmfs and that's why in the atlas cvmfs > page I put also lhcb instructions. They didn't push loudly in the UK > because we were already moving. > What's the current status of ATLAS, LHCb and CMS. AIUI, all the ATLAS sites have converted - and probably all the UK sites that support ATLAS. Chris > cheers > alessandra > > On 27/03/2012 15:23, Sam Skipsey wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> >> I think I gave my small points earlier in that thread. >> >> Basically, though, fairly straightforward; after the initial slow >> start identifying the initial corruption issue, support has been >> responsive, rapid and effective. >> >> Also, it helped with LHCb (despite their not actually telling people >> to use it until just now) as much as ATLAS. >> >> Sam >> >> On 27 March 2012 15:21, Christopher J. Walker <[log in to unmask] >> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> I've volunteered to give a brief talk on CVMFS experience in the UK. >> >> I'm in the process of updating the talk I gave at hepsysman in BHAM. >> >> Steve Traylan wants info on: >> >> On 26/03/12 17:18, Steve Traylen wrote: >> >> >> > I guess the practical application/problems / scale/ >> difficulty , >> >> easyness to deploy. >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Problems you anticipate, >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I guess the message from the whole session is >> proposing that cvmfs is >> >> good for other >> >> >> > >> >> >> So if anyone has anything useful to add, I need it ASAP - the talk >> is tomorrow morning. >> >> Chris >> >> >