JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  March 2012

PHD-DESIGN March 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

The business side of the Bell Labs story

From:

Don Norman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 09:33:37 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (134 lines)

Well, as someone who actually knows about both the original Bell Labs,
the current Bell Labs (also briefly renamed AT&T Labs and also split
into Lucent Labs and Bel Labs) and Facebook,  which until it moved to
new quarters, it was just a few block away from my home.

I want to expand this statement. It shows an incomplete knowledge of the facts.
-----
> *The AT&T company went through some fundamental changes and then the identity was essentially sold off (to people who then went on to destroy one of the company's biggest assets--the Saul Bass logo) so the current AT&T has just about nothing to do with this discussion.
-----
Saul Bass logo? As if a logo is what makes a company great? Anyone who
thinks a brand is a logo, well, ....  Changing the logo was a small
side effect of a much larger change. It needed to be changed (see
below)

AT&T (American Telephone and Telegraph) had a monopoly on phone
service. They got it by arguing that phone was too critical an
infrastructure to allow it to be fragmented. At the time, different
phone companies would not interconnect, so you could only call someone
if they were served by the same company you used.  The US Congress
granted them a monopoly with several conditions, among which were that
profits were regulated, held to fixed percentage of expenses.

Ah, the more money they spent, the more profit they made. Voila! Bell
Labs. Spend a huge amount of money on research and increase company
expenses, thereby increasing profits.  Regulators scrutinized company
expenses to make sure they were not padded, but scientific research?
Oh, yes, that is essential. So the labs were given a huge budget. It
worked for everyone.

Many of my friends worked at Bell Labs and did brilliant research
because they had relatively unlimited funding and almost no
restrictions. No deadlines, no targets. As long as they could show
that the scientific community gave them high grades. In fact, some of
my friends did have one restriction placed on them: they were
explicitly told NOT to work on anything dealing with the phone system.
("We already do quite well there, so study something else.")  So my
friends studied human reaction time, electronic books, radio telecopy
(a Nobel prize for this), developed electronic music systems -- the
very first and still the foundation of much of what is used today),
and advanced electronic circuits.  They did hire the very best. They
did brilliant work. They got many, many awards and prizes, deservedly.

In 1974, the US government stopped the arrangement. telephone advances
were being stifled by AT&Ts conservative nature and restriction on
connecting "foreign" equipment to the phone system. So, no answering
machines, no computers, no transmission of music (unless you used AT&T
expensive circuits and engineers, which is what all the radio
broadcasting companies did -- AT&T's monopoly extended to
intercontinental radio and TV). Companies that wanted to enter this
territory were sued. But then the unexpected happened: a few of those
companies won their suits. And soon the clamor arose for deregulation.
 The US congress finally reacted.

In the end, deregulation and splitting up AT&T was good. It unleashed
the wonderful advances that have led to many of the things we take for
granted today but that AT&T would not permit.  But it destroyed the
funding source for BellLabs in the process.

No more monopoly and AT&T had to earn money like every other company,
which meant cutting costs.  Most of my friends saw the writing on the
wall and fled the company. Some went to other companies, but most went
to universities (UC, San Diego --where I was at the time--  got some
of the electronic music folks, Stanford got the rest).

I visited the new Bell Labs, now called AT&T Labs, and the head of
research told me how he had to fire everyone who was not relevant. He
had to completely dismantle the radio telescope team, even  though it
had a Nobel prize for its work and he was the former head of the team
and shared in the Nobel. That stuff was wonderful, he told me, but it
did not advance the company mission. He had no choice but to close
down that line of work. (The one positive thing he told me was that he
freely handed out copies of the Design of Everyday Things to his
workers, and he opened a cupboard door to show me a huge stack of
them.)

Another good friend of mine later on became head of AT&T Labs (and CTO
of the entire company), but by then, the game was over. I think it was
this person who got rid of the logo. But he should have. Logos
represent something, and the something that this logo represented did
not exist anymore.  AT&T at the time was collapsing. In fact it did
collapse and a massive reorganization followed. But that is another
story.

====
Bell Labs was a wonderful asset to the United states and to the world.
But it was paid for by a ruse, a hoax, by deception.  No profit making
company can afford to do this. Today, in high tech, only two companies
remain that does anything close to pure research, and even it is
mission guided: Microsoft (which as the top research labs in the world
in this area) and Google (which is still small and chaotic, but
getting better).  Google has so much money that it can do anything.
This will change when the competition heats up (e.g., Microsoft which
has just awakened
(see http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/microsofts_rebirth_windows_8_on_phone_tablet_pc.html
) and Facebook, which will take over the advertising market if Google
doesn't watch out, and advertising is how Google makes its money.

The loss of the old Bell Labs was a disaster, but blame American
politics because it should have been a national lab, paid for by the
nation.  Actually, good thing it didn't become a national lab. We have
a bunch of them. The US Congress gives it so many restrictions and
requires so many reports justifying their expenses and activities,
that they cannot hire the world's best scientists (with some
exceptions) and cannot do their work properly.   The King is dead, and
there is no replacement.
==========
Facebook? Creative people, but their job is to monetize social
networks. (Facebook has hired at least one world-class designer --
Shelly Evenson -- whom some of you might know.)

Facebook just moved a few miles away to a brand new campus. Well, an
old campus: they moved into the buildings that used to be owned by Sun
Microsystems. Sun is dead, acquired by Oracle.  (Google moved into the
old building that used to be owned by Silicon Graphics. Silicon
Graphics is dead, and nobody thought them worth buying.)  Now Google
has outgrown those buildings so they are moving to a new campus on
what used to be called "Moffet Field," that used to be owned by the
U.S. Navy, right on the NASA Ames campus.

(My friends at BMW labs moved nearby and they complain that there are
no decent restaurants near them: they now have to drive to get lunch.
Why? Because Google serves such wonderful, subsidized food, that all
the local restaurants closed up for lack of business. But you have to
work for - or be a guest of-- Google to eat there.  (I've eaten there:
it is overwhelming, almost as nice as the BMW cafeteria in their
headquarters in Munich.)

Bell Labs, AT&T, Sun, Silicon Graphics, Moffett Field -- all former
empires that rules their territories. All now dead. Tha't life.

Speaking of BMW, I've gotta go pack. Off to BMW in Munich.

Don (in Palo Alto, California, for the next few hours)

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager