Meta-analysis has become increasingly common during the last 30 years. What
have been the most important milestones as regards giving the metods used
reasonable proportions and sizes? What have wee learnt so far? Strengths and
weaknesses published after Eysenck's "An exercise in mega-silliness.". What are
the most important non-technical inputs that a EBM-practician should ber aware
of?
Do you know of any relavant discussion forums? I promise to read your
suggestions and to put together - at the least - a list of suggested topics.
Regards,
Bengt
|