The answer for today without wine is that it doesn't scale to all WNs in WLCG, a few more than 100.
John "had whine with lunch" G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stuart Wakefield
> Sent: 20 December 2011 14:36
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Ops meeting today @ 11am
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:13 PM, John Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > About the suggestion below. CERN are asking that sites don't point to
> them so do we want to raise the issue with CERN and say we reject your
> request and insist on still using you? EGI are monitoring the
> availability of the combination RAL.OR.Imperial and it has been
> identically 100% for the few months they have been monitoring. I know
> some people get a warm and fuzzy feeling from relying on CERN (no-one
> ever got sacked for doing what CERN do:-) but one can understand that
> this isn't scalable.
>
> One wonders why a hundred or so clients isn't scalable but thats a
> question for another day.
>
> Cheers
> Stuart "Had wine with lunch" W
|