Greetings all!
I'm sending a composite of two messages to RadStats (mailing
list of the Radical Statistics Group), composed from the
original query by:
Kate Bloor <[log in to unmask]>
and a response from:
Jane Galbraith <[log in to unmask]>
(to both of whom this message is being copied, so you have
their addresses, to reply directly).
The originals can be read at:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/
webadmin?A2=ind1111&L=RADSTATS&F=&S=&P=12704
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/
webadmin?A2=ind1111&L=RADSTATS&F=&S=&P=13569
I am doing this on behalf of Kate and Jane. I think there
is a lot of good knowledge out there on EBH which could be
very helpful for this query.
QUERY:
Can anyone direct me to any good articles or papers, that show
that privatisation of the NHS is not (or is) more efficient,
or cheaper, than public provided care? Or information about the
impact of [UK] coalition [government] policies on actual cuts
or reductions in services?
Politicians look for evidence only to support their argument,
statisticians should assess all evidence.
What we need is good quality evidence and discussion. Does
that exist in the public/private NHS debate?
END OF QUERY.
With thanks,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[log in to unmask]>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Nov-11 Time: 22:04:45
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
|