I think the free version will do this:
http://agreestat.com/agreestat
Best regards,
Christian
Am 17.10.2011 21:17, schrieb Yaser Adi:
>
> I should be grateful to any list member who can direct me to
> any stats software that can calculate the:
> weighted multi-raters kappa. i.e for calculating the agreement between
> say 4 or 5 raters.
> I could not do this in StatsDirect or SPSS.
>
> Thank you in advance.
> Yaser
>
>
>
> /Dr Y. Adi
> Senior Researcher
> Shaikh Abdullah Bahamdan's Research Chair for Evidence-Based Health Care
> and Knowledge Translation
> College of Medicine, King Saud University
> P.O.Box 2925, Riyadh 11461
> SAUDI ARABIA
> Email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:47:06 +0100
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Systematic reviews of qualitative studies
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> That surprises me. Don’t hierarchies distinguish between systematic
> reviews of RCTs, those of cohort studies, those of case control
> series....all of which are considered as operating as different levels
> of evidence?
>
> *From:*[log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On
> Behalf Of *Susan Fowler
> *Sent:* 17 October 2011 18:42
> *To:* Kathleen Irvine
> *Cc:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: Systematic reviews of qualitative studies
>
> Most hierarchies of evidence I see don't distinguish between a
> systematic review of quantitative vs qualitative studies. I would think
> if it is a systematic review of qualitative studies it is still a
> systematic review and thus still in the same place as other systematic
> reviews on the hierarchy of evidence.
>
> --
> Susan Fowler, MLIS
> Medical Librarian
>
> Evidence at Becker:
> http://beckerguides.wustl.edu/ebm
>
> Mobile Resources Guide:
> http://beckerguides.wustl.edu/mobileresources
>
> Becker Medical Library, Washington University in St. Louis
> 314-362-8092
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Kathleen Irvine <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Can anyone advise how systematic reviews of qualitative studies should
> be regarded in terms of evidence-based practice? They don’t have a place
> on the normal hierarchies of evidence but often seem to be of potential
> value to clinicians.
> Kathleen Irvine
> Subject Librarian
> Highland Health Sciences Library
> University of Stirling
> Highland Campus
> Centre for Health Science
> Inverness
> IV2 4AG
> (01463) 255608
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2009/2010
>
> The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number
> SC 011159.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2009/2010
> The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number
> SC 011159.
|