Dear all,
There are lists of projects and digital tools in the Digital Classicist
wiki[1]; elsewhere there are further lists of tools and taxonomies of
Digital Humanities methods[2][3]; presumably there must exist (even if
only in our heads) lists of sub-disciplines and practices of Classical
Studies/Ancient History.
* Would it, do you think, be useful to be able to visualize and navigate
the relationships between these projects, tools, disciplines, methods,
people? Is this the most useful way of describing digital methods in an
area such as classics?
* Can you think of questions it would be valuable to be able to ask that
might be facilitated by such a visualization?
* If such a tool existed, would it be used by classicists at large (i.e.
those not already self-selected by being on this list)?
Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
Notes:
[1] http://wiki.digitalclassicist.org/
[2] http://www.arts-humanities.net/ictguides/methods/
[3] http://www.arts-humanities.net/tools/
--
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Researcher in Digital Epigraphy)
Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: [log in to unmask]
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
--
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)
Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: [log in to unmask]
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
|