On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Sam Skipsey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> We're keen to get CVMFS working at Glasgow (although probably not this
> week, what with people being at HEPSYSMAN and all), especially since
> it takes some load off of the network for us and makes things
> generally a bit simpler.
Just to add am happy to help with CVMFS questions if they arrive on here.
We are benefiting a lot generally from it, users are happy it seems and load
on the afs services has dropped considerably. LHCb has moved 100% to
CVMFS, atlas are using it significantly though to some extent its a per site
special hack at the moment, (they are working on it.) CMS are not using it yet.
Alice... is of course another case.
Steve.
--
Steve Traylen
|