Someone in CMS (Ken Bloom maybe) told me that they saw CVMFS as a good solution for their Tier3s so they got the software without needing any griddy bits.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Traylen
> Sent: 28 June 2011 19:55
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Today's ops meeting at 11am
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Sam Skipsey <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > We're keen to get CVMFS working at Glasgow (although probably not this
> > week, what with people being at HEPSYSMAN and all), especially since
> > it takes some load off of the network for us and makes things
> > generally a bit simpler.
>
> Just to add am happy to help with CVMFS questions if they arrive on here.
> We are benefiting a lot generally from it, users are happy it seems and
> load
> on the afs services has dropped considerably. LHCb has moved 100% to
> CVMFS, atlas are using it significantly though to some extent its a per
> site
> special hack at the moment, (they are working on it.) CMS are not using it
> yet.
> Alice... is of course another case.
>
> Steve.
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Traylen
|