You're referring to film in the vulgar sense of a material strip of 'celluloid.' But film is the medium, not the technical delivery technology.
H
> Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 2:57:45 PM, one wrote:
>
>> now that cinema only accounts for 10-15 per cent of income generated
>> by films, shouldn't we discuss the topic of filmophilia replacing the
>> older and quainter notion of cinephilia: i.e. of people who love films
>> but don't necessarily watch them in the cinema, but on any form of
>> digital delivery system (u no, DVD, PC, iPad, iPhone etc. etc.) ? Has
>> there been any scholarly work done on this?
>
> Since none of those devices display film, surely "filmophilia" is at least
> as much a misnomer?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jim Flannery
> [log in to unmask]
>
> --
> Film-Philosophy
> After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to
> To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
> Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
> For technical help email: [log in to unmask], not the list
> --
> Film-Philosophy journal: http://www.film-philosophy.com/
> Film-Philosophy Conference (6-8 July 2011): http://www.film-philosophy.com/conference/
> Contact: [log in to unmask]
> --
--
Film-Philosophy
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For technical help email: [log in to unmask], not the list
--
Film-Philosophy journal: http://www.film-philosophy.com/
Film-Philosophy Conference (6-8 July 2011): http://www.film-philosophy.com/conference/
Contact: [log in to unmask]
--
|