Michael,
Thanks for your response.
>Hey,
>
>On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:49:10PM +0000, Michael Keaser wrote:
>> I've tried putting in several commands in my .cshrc file, but none have seemed to work.
>
>Your troubles arise from your desire to use a non-POSIX shell. The
>Debian package doesn't offer much convenience for csh users. I don't
>plan to change that very soon, as I have no clue about csh and there are
>really a lot of powerful shells that are POSIX compatible.
>
>If you want to keep using csh you have two options:
>
>1. use the versioned commands
>
> whenever you want e.g. fslmaths call fsl4.1-fslmaths instead ....
>
> (and everything will just work)
>
aha! i see that now. yes, you are right that works from the command line.
>or
>
>2. manually set your FSLDIR to /usr/share/fsl/4.1/ (info is in the docs, manpage,
> ...), source the CSH config file that comes with FSL in
> FSLDIR/etc/fslconf/fsl.csh and adjust the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to let FSL
> find its internal libraries. In bash that would be somethin like:
>
I keep getting this error message:
/usr/share/fsl/4.1//etc/fslconf/fslmachtype.sh: Command not found.
When i try to source the fsl.csh.
> # Configure the linker search path for Debian FSLs internal shared libraries
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/fsl/4.1${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}}
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> I was planning to get rid of this last step, but I haven't gotten to
> it yet, because it is rather low-priority for me -- you are the
> second person I'm aware of the insists on using csh ;-).
>
>Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
>
>May I asked what other software needs to have you using CSH as your
>interactive shell (and not simply as an interpreter)?
>
Well, i use AFNI, matlab, SPM, etc., but i don't think its that imperative that we use the tcsh. We could probably make the swtich with no problem.
I'm just wondering, if we do switch over to bash, will we be able to type just "fsl", and the entire gui will come up with the selection of options? We were able to do that previously in Redhat.
Thanks again, for your help.
>Michael
>
>
>--
>Michael Hanke
>http://mih.voxindeserto.de
|