JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PLAGIARISM Archives


PLAGIARISM Archives

PLAGIARISM Archives


PLAGIARISM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PLAGIARISM Home

PLAGIARISM Home

PLAGIARISM  December 2010

PLAGIARISM December 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: PLAGIARISM Digest - 26 Nov 2010 to 1 Dec 2010 (#2010-88)

From:

"Brace, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Plagiarism <[log in to unmask]>, Brace, Kevin

Date:

Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:24:46 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

A quick straw poll, do any of your institutions use  Turnitin?





Yes





and if you do, do you have a threshold percentage set for the

originality report which triggers a plagiarism investigation?



No (still working on a policy to encompass issues like this)







Regards.



Kevin Brace. Bsc(Hons), MSc, Ieng, CMALT, PDF-ELT

Associate Head of Technology Enhanced Learning

Centre for Learning Innovation & Professional Practice

http://www1.aston.ac.uk/clipp/.  Please read our CLIPP Blog for all latest news

Aston University

Birmingham B4 7ET

T: 0121 204 4230

M: 0787 2421741





CLIPP is pleased to announce that the refurbished Learning Development Centre has reopened and is available to students and staff for maths and study skills workshops, one-one tutorials and has a range of group study areas which are available for booking.





-----Original Message-----

From: Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of PLAGIARISM automatic digest system

Sent: 02 December 2010 00:01

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: PLAGIARISM Digest - 26 Nov 2010 to 1 Dec 2010 (#2010-88)



There are 5 messages totaling 1354 lines in this issue.



Topics of the day:



  1. Use of turnitin advice (5)



*************************************************************************

You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change

your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

*************************************************************************



----------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:56:40 -0000

From:    Roz Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Use of turnitin advice



Hello



A quick straw poll, do any of your institutions use  Turnitin?



and if you do, do you have a threshold percentage set for the

originality report which triggers a plagiarism investigation?



I would be grateful of any feedback and process you put in place to

support the threshold?



Thank you for your time



Regards



Roz"











*******************************************************



Roz Howard



Academic Support Manager for College of Health & Social Care



Information Literacy Project Manager



The Library



University of Salford



Allerton Building



Salford M6 6PU







0161 295 2441



07799075845









*************************************************************************

You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change

your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

*************************************************************************



------------------------------



Date:    Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:16:46 +0000

From:    "Niels R. Walet" <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Use of turnitin advice



Roz Howard wrote:

>

> Hello

>

> A quick straw poll, do any of your institutions use  Turnitin?

>

> and if you do, do you have a threshold percentage set for the

> originality report which triggers a plagiarism investigation?

>

> I would be grateful of any feedback and process you put in place to

> support the threshold?

>

> Thank you for your time

>

> Regards

>

> Roz”

>

>

>

>

>

> *******************************************************

>

> Roz Howard

>

> Academic Support Manager for College of Health & Social Care

>

> Information Literacy Project Manager

>

> The Library

>

> University of Salford

>

> Allerton Building

>

> Salford M6 6PU

>

>

>

> /0161 295 2441/

>

> /07799075845/

>

>

>

> *************************************************************************

> You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To

> Unsubscribe, change your subscription options, or access list

> archives, visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

> *************************************************************************

Many of us do use turnitin, but I hope that none use a "threshold". The

most painful thing to learn about turnitin is that the percentage scores

have little to do with plagiarism without considering many other factors

(number of sources, common phrases, length of report,subject area,...).

The person managing the essay will have to look down the submission

list, and decide what needs to be investigated by looking at the

reports! From essay to essay, you can probably decide on a lower

boundary where the originality reports don't require (detailed) scrutiny.



Niels



--

Prof. Niels R. Walet                   Phone:  +44(0)1613063693

School of Physics and Astronomy        Fax:    +44(0)1613064303

The University of Manchester           Mobile: +44(0)7905438934

Manchester, M13 9PL,  UK               room 7.7, Schuster Building

email: [log in to unmask]

web:   http://www.theory.physics.manchester.ac.uk/~mccsnrw



*************************************************************************

You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change

your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

*************************************************************************



------------------------------



Date:    Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:25:09 -0000

From:    Anne Flood <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Use of turnitin advice



Hi, Roz,







The threshold will vary - it very much depends on whether the piece is being

used formatively or summatively, and the subject matter in question.







For example, if you have someone who is undertaking work where there are

very few resources, then you would expect there to be a higher number of

matches.  Similarly, if you have an 1st year undergraduate group all writing

about Freud's theory of personality, say, then the matches would also be

high.







Our advice is to check everything that comes back 'red' (75% +) and 'blue'

(0%) (this usually indicates there are no citations/references in the

piece).  We also advise that all work is checked if a class consists of less

than, say, 70 students, and that a sample of all work is checked if the

students numbers are over 70.







Kind regards,



Anne







From: Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Roz Howard

Sent: 01 December 2010 08:57

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Use of turnitin advice







Hello



A quick straw poll, do any of your institutions use  Turnitin?



and if you do, do you have a threshold percentage set for the originality

report which triggers a plagiarism investigation?



I would be grateful of any feedback and process you put in place to support

the threshold?



Thank you for your time



Regards



Roz"











*******************************************************



Roz Howard



Academic Support Manager for College of Health & Social Care



Information Literacy Project Manager



The Library



University of Salford



Allerton Building



Salford M6 6PU







0161 295 2441



07799075845







*************************************************************************

You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe,

change your subscription options, or access list archives, visit

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

*************************************************************************





*************************************************************************

You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change

your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

*************************************************************************



------------------------------



Date:    Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:53:12 +0000

From:    Jude Carroll <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Use of turnitin advice



Hello all, hello Roz amd hello Anne who just made some suggestions on

'checking'.



First, I think one of the real advantages of a mail base like this is how

people are will pile in and make suggestions, even if they are ones which

pop up so often.    I actually had this question already today in the 'real'

world, not on discussion lists.  So, a hot topic.



Next, I suggest a very specific meaning of the word 'check' which Anne uses

in her suggestion as to  how to treat, say, 70 students' work.  For many

academics, this 'checking' might imply a detailed scrutiny.  In fact, I

would say, it means literally a five second scan for how the percentage is

derived.  Click on the icon 'traffic light' coloured square - is that 38%

from one source, three?  twelve at 3% each, sixty seven?  I'd classify the

first as worth more time, the second yes, the third....hmmmm, depends (Anne

sets out useful criteria] , the last, no,  move on.   Usually, this means a

reasonable number, even from a list of 70, within a reasonably short time.



When I talk to academics about this, you can feel their shoulders drop a

bit.





Jude









On 1 December 2010 09:25, Anne Flood <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



> Hi, Roz,

>

>

>

> The threshold will vary – it very much depends on whether the piece is

> being used formatively or summatively, and the subject matter in question.

>

>

>

> For example, if you have someone who is undertaking work where there are

> very few resources, then you would expect there to be a higher number of

> matches.  Similarly, if you have an 1st year undergraduate group all

> writing about Freud’s theory of personality, say, then the matches would

> also be high.

>

>

>

> Our advice is to check everything that comes back ‘red’ (75% +) and ‘blue’

> (0%) (this usually indicates there are no citations/references in the

> piece).  We also advise that all work is checked if a class consists of less

> than, say, 70 students, and that a sample of all work is checked if the

> students numbers are over 70.

>

>

>

> Kind regards,

>

> Anne

>

>

>

> *From:* Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Roz

> Howard

> *Sent:* 01 December 2010 08:57

> *To:* [log in to unmask]

> *Subject:* Use of turnitin advice

>

>

>

> Hello

>

> A quick straw poll, do any of your institutions use  Turnitin?

>

> and if you do, do you have a threshold percentage set for the originality

> report which triggers a plagiarism investigation?

>

> I would be grateful of any feedback and process you put in place to support

> the threshold?

>

> Thank you for your time

>

> Regards

>

> Roz”

>

>

>

>

>

> *******************************************************

>

> Roz Howard

>

> Academic Support Manager for College of Health & Social Care

>

> Information Literacy Project Manager

>

> The Library

>

> University of Salford

>

> Allerton Building

>

> Salford M6 6PU

>

>

>

> *0161 295 2441*

>

> *07799075845*

>

>

>

> *************************************************************************

> You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe,

> change your subscription options, or access list archives, visit

> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html*************************************************************************

>  *************************************************************************

> You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe,

> change your subscription options, or access list archives, visit

> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html*************************************************************************

>







--

Jude Carroll

OCSLD, Oxford Brookes University

+44 1865 485662



*************************************************************************

You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change

your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

*************************************************************************



------------------------------



Date:    Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:03:44 -0000

From:    Lynn Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Use of turnitin advice



Hi



Although we have a guiding threshold, the scanning approach is the one I

use when looking at submissions. Often I find that a good number of the

matches are small and to other students' work for the same assignment

because they are the common language of the subject. This means that

they can be ignored quite easily and without too much time being

consumed. Bigger matches might be collusion and they like the rest of

the work that has caused concern get lots of attention to detail to

understand what is going on.



Lynn



Lynn J Shaw

Head of Operational Management and Development

Professional Higher Education







________________________________



From: Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jude

Carroll

Sent: 01 December 2010 09:53

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Use of turnitin advice





Hello all, hello Roz amd hello Anne who just made some suggestions on

'checking'.



First, I think one of the real advantages of a mail base like this is

how people are will pile in and make suggestions, even if they are ones

which pop up so often.    I actually had this question already today in

the 'real' world, not on discussion lists.  So, a hot topic.



Next, I suggest a very specific meaning of the word 'check' which Anne

uses in her suggestion as to  how to treat, say, 70 students' work.  For

many academics, this 'checking' might imply a detailed scrutiny.  In

fact, I would say, it means literally a five second scan for how the

percentage is derived.  Click on the icon 'traffic light' coloured

square - is that 38% from one source, three?  twelve at 3% each, sixty

seven?  I'd classify the first as worth more time, the second yes, the

third....hmmmm, depends (Anne sets out useful criteria] , the last, no,

move on.   Usually, this means a reasonable number, even from a list of

70, within a reasonably short time.



When I talk to academics about this, you can feel their shoulders drop a

bit.





Jude









On 1 December 2010 09:25, Anne Flood <[log in to unmask]> wrote:





        Hi, Roz,







        The threshold will vary - it very much depends on whether the

piece is being used formatively or summatively, and the subject matter

in question.







        For example, if you have someone who is undertaking work where

there are very few resources, then you would expect there to be a higher

number of matches.  Similarly, if you have an 1st year undergraduate

group all writing about Freud's theory of personality, say, then the

matches would also be high.







        Our advice is to check everything that comes back 'red' (75% +)

and 'blue' (0%) (this usually indicates there are no

citations/references in the piece).  We also advise that all work is

checked if a class consists of less than, say, 70 students, and that a

sample of all work is checked if the students numbers are over 70.







        Kind regards,



        Anne







        From: Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of

Roz Howard

        Sent: 01 December 2010 08:57

        To: [log in to unmask]

        Subject: Use of turnitin advice







        Hello



        A quick straw poll, do any of your institutions use  Turnitin?



        and if you do, do you have a threshold percentage set for the

originality report which triggers a plagiarism investigation?



        I would be grateful of any feedback and process you put in place

to support the threshold?



        Thank you for your time



        Regards



        Roz"











        *******************************************************



        Roz Howard



        Academic Support Manager for College of Health & Social Care



        Information Literacy Project Manager



        The Library



        University of Salford



        Allerton Building



        Salford M6 6PU







        0161 295 2441



        07799075845









************************************************************************

* You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To

Unsubscribe, change your subscription options, or access list archives,

visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

************************************************************************

*





************************************************************************

* You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To

Unsubscribe, change your subscription options, or access list archives,

visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

************************************************************************

*









--

Jude Carroll

OCSLD, Oxford Brookes University

+44 1865 485662



************************************************************************

* You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To

Unsubscribe, change your subscription options, or access list archives,

visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

************************************************************************

*











This email and the information it contains may be privileged and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient you may not disclose, copy, distribute or retain any part of this message or attachments.



If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately [by clicking 'Reply'] and delete this email. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the ifs School of Finance , or any other brands that the ifs School of Finance may use.



The ifs School of Finance is a registered charity incorporated by Royal Charter (Registered Charity Number 297107) whose address is 8th Floor, Peninsular House, 36 Monument Street,

London, EC3R 8LJ.

*************************************************************************

You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change

your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

*************************************************************************



------------------------------



End of PLAGIARISM Digest - 26 Nov 2010 to 1 Dec 2010 (#2010-88)

***************************************************************



*************************************************************************

You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change

your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html

*************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
July 2023
May 2023
April 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
August 2021
May 2021
April 2021
January 2021
October 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
December 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager