1. Here (in Norway) artworks that are disseminated through exhibitions and publications are listed. But the publication as such is not one's own publication. The artwork, architecture, design or what ever outcome that has been approved by others through generally accepted publication channels is what is counted. Being accepted at a gallery is counted as some sort of peer reviewing. Unpublished artwork does not count.
But still they have not been able to make a system where these listings are counted in the same way as the scientific publications so that they would have an impact on the budgets of an institution. Therefore the art and design schools here still don't have this economic system. But as a scholarly merit in the realm of art, design and architecture they count.
2. That's difficult: to my mind art as such is not research (normally). You need a reflective layer e.g. text that externalizes the art work. But there could be exceptions....
Best
Birger
-----Original Message-----
From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Terence Love
Sent: 1. desember 2010 09:12
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: An academic question
Hello,
This is a question for members of PhD-design on the Art side of Design
I'm acting as a 2nd assessor on some doctoral scholarship applications for
an Art department. A couple of things have surprised me and I'd welcome
advice on whether they are common/acceptable practice in the Art realm.
1. Claiming as one's own publications when one's work is mentioned in
publications authored by others.
2. Claiming all one's artworks as research.
Best wishes,
Terry
|