JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS Archives

RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS  December 2010

RADSTATS December 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Religion and the census

From:

"FELDMAN,Harry" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FELDMAN,Harry

Date:

Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:37:03 +1100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (122 lines)

Dear Ted,

The salience of racial varieties of other organisms is suggestive, but doesn't actually evidence an analogous phenomenon in human populations.

In my view, the most useful approach to race is to recognise it as a social construct.  As I understand it, construction of a race entails 'biologising' the purported racial traits - the racist believes them to be heritable, whether skin, eye, or hair colour, texture, or shape; religion, language, accent, surname, religion of forebears, or what have you - racists are not real particular about what they essentialise about the population to be discriminated against.  In this sense, then, 'cultural racism' just places a veneer over the fundamental biologisation.  If you're looking for a Paki to bash up, you don't enquire closely into their place of birth, mother tongue, or any other cultural trapping - if they 'look like a Paki', that's good enough.

As long as discrimination goes on, it is worth collecting data about race, or as close as we can come to such an ill-defined and poorly understood category.

In solidarity,


Harry Feldman
Safe Work Australia
Data & Analysis Section
Strategic Policy Branch
GPO Box 641
Canberra ACT 2601
Location code: C220NB2
Phone (02) 6240 6812







-----Original Message-----
From: email list for Radical Statistics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ted Harding
Sent: Tuesday, 21 December 2010 10:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Religion and the census

This is a very interesting discussion! However, one comment on
Ursula's constribution: "Assuming that we think 'race' matters
(and in my view it only matters insofar as people are discriminated
against because of it)" -- don't forget that "race" is a category
which is by definition associated with heritable characteristics,
which it may be needful to be aware of.

I am certainly opposed to exploiting racial category for the
purpose of negative discrimination, vilification, etc. But there
are, for instance, such things as heritable propensities to
diseases. Take, for instance, Thalassemia (a heritable genetic
"defect" which leads to formation of "abnormal" haemoglobin
molecules, resulting in a form of anaemia). It is particularly
associated with the Eastern Mediterranean (hence the name), North
Africa, the Middle East, Pakistan, and parts of India. Also, in a
variant form, with West Africa. As to its being a "defect", it
probably arose as a mutation conferring resistance to the effects
of Malaria, hence in its time was advantageous, similarly to the
heritable Sickle Cell Anaemia (especially prevalent in sub-Saharan
Africa). Such diseases remain prevalent in the descendants of the
original beneficiaries, and race is therefore a marker for propensity
to such diseases.

I recall, from my time in Manchester, noticing a Thalassemia Clinic
on Oxford Road, close to the University Precinct. I suppose this
would have been associated with the relatively large Pakistani
population (though there are many people of other relevant races
also in Manchester), and would have been there for their benefit.

I should imagine that a Manchester GP, being consulted by a patient
of relevant race with symptoms of Anaemia, would normally think of
referring the patient to the Thalassemia Clinic in order to have
the appropriate examinations carried out.

Nor should we forget the greater susceptibility of fair-skinned
Northern races to skin cancers induced by exposure to levels of
solar radiation greater than they are genetically adapted to.
Of course, the descendants of such people who emigrate from those
parts to warmer and sunnier climes will be selected against, and
will tend to die out, relative to descendants who adapt genetically
towards darker skins (and thereby give rise to a new "race").

So the best medical advice to Costa-immigrant Geordies, Scots,
etc. might be "Go back to your own country!"

Joking apart, I did want to make the serious point that race is
a form of categorisation that can carry useful information
(e.g. about disease, as I have exemplified) which can be exploited
*to the benefit of a person of that race*, and therefore matters
in a *positive* sense. Whether that will be put to beneficial
effect, however, depends on a sound knowledge of the propensities
etc. which are associated with race. This should of course be done
quite objectively, and people should not be put off doing by fear
of being accused of "racism" by virtue of the abuse of "race" by
ignorant, prejudiced and malevolent people!

The wholly worthy reaction against abusive racism has resulted in
an unrealistic condemnation of attention to racial characteristics,
leading to statements like "'race' has no biological significance"
in a QCA document "Respect for All" for Science Key Stage 1 (2003).
This prompted me into a long schmeer on RadStats developing the
above theme, which can be found at:

https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind03&
L=RADSTATS&F=&S=&X=0216471843DE20FB13&
Y=ted.harding%40manchester.ac.uk&P=85923

[equivalently: http://tinyurl.com/34hftt6 ]

Of course race has biological significance. But let "race" be used
positively, for beneficial discrimination, and let not those who
wish to use it positively feel obliged to hide under the table when
those who rightly condemn using it negatively fail to discriminate
betwen positive and negative -- as if the mere mention of "race"
is negative racism. It isn't!

Best wishes to all,
Ted.
[PS: Earlier contributions included by Ursula are here snipped,
 to save bulk].

******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager