JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  July 2010

MINING-HISTORY July 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Mendip Calamineries

From:

Roger Hutchins <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The mining-history list.

Date:

Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:51:26 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (110 lines)

Yes I did mean Stannary. Thanks for the correction. The suffixes ery and ary mean the same thing I suspect.
 
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:02:55 +0100
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Mendip Calamineries
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> Roger
> 
> Did you mean Stannary?
> 
> Phil
> 
> Roger Hutchins wrote:
> > On the subject of "Calaminery". Was the word meant to be "Cala-minery" or "Calamine-ery"
> >
> > I suggest that the suffix "ery" was attached to calamine as in "Stannery" "Fishery" "Bakery" "Colliery" etc.
> > The Suffix "ery" can denote occupation, place or establishment or things collectively. 
> > 
> >> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:23:14 +0100
> >> From: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: Mendip Calamineries
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>
> >> Peter's response to my examples of the use of 'minery':-
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >>> To my mind there are two forms there - 'minery' in the geographical sense, 
> >>> referring to a mining field or liberty and encompassing all the processes 
> >>> carried out there (as on Mendip), and the other as a skill, as in having a 
> >>> knowledge of 'minery'. I suspect it was very much a term of its time - the 
> >>> 17th/18th centuries.
> >>> 
> >>
> >> prompted me to revisit Gough and, on the basis of a rapid skim through, I 
> >> found the following on the subject of mineries:-
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> p.72 Example of laws from Queen Mary's reign - 'The oulde Auncyent 
> >> Custum of the occupasyon of the mynerys in and upon the Quyns majestys 
> >> forest of Mendyp wythyn her gracys countye of Somerset being one of the iiij 
> >> stapulls of Ynglon which hath bene exersysd and contynuyd thrugh the seyd 
> >> forest from the tyme whereof man hath noo memory as here after doth 
> >> pertyculerly doth Apere'.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> p.74 Now the first recorded meeting of the Minery Court of Chewton took 
> >> place on 10 July 1554, and it was then stated that before that time the 
> >> workmen in the mines had 'claimed Customes to and for their Occupation . 
> >> amongst themselves to be observed and kept'.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> p.89 To each of the four lordships there belonged a 'minery', where the 
> >> 'buddles', or washing places, and smelting-furnaces and storehouses were, 
> >> and where the lead-reeves performed many of their functions; the minery was 
> >> in fact, the head-quarters in each district, and thither the miners, having 
> >> obtained their ore from the pits all over the hills, brought it for making 
> >> into lead, weighing, payment of 'lot-lead', and so on.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The first two quotes cover the codification of long established, but 
> >> unwritten, mining laws, under Queen Mary (1553-1558). Like similar laws 
> >> elsewhere, they set out the process for getting permission to mine and cover 
> >> relationships between miners, and miners and the mineral lord(s). The 
> >> Mendip laws also allow "that any workman hath landyd Any wore [ore] he maye 
> >> carre hyt to weshing and blowing [smelting] to what myndry [minery] he 
> >> semyth best for hys proffyt and commodyte so that he doo paye the tenth of 
> >> that in lede or wore to the lord of the soyll where hyt was dygyd etc".
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The last quote (p.89), Gough's attempt to sum the situation up, seems to 
> >> rely on this freedom to move ore between mineries for dressing and smelting. 
> >> Peter now seems to accept that, as I proposed in my first response, "Perhaps 
> >> Gough drew his definition too tightly" and the consequent error of his own 
> >> statement "As you will know - the 'minery' on Mendip was a lead ore 
> >> processing area.", accepting instead that it refers to the area being mined 
> >> (including provision for dressing and smelting). He goes on to suggest that 
> >> minery's other meaning is "of its time", which is harder to prove one way or 
> >> the other. Nevertheless, there are other examples of a word having similar 
> >> dual uses, e.g. surgery (a place) - where surgery (the skill) is practised.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I would suggest that to equate minery with liberty is also wrong and that it 
> >> was more tightly related to the area actually being mined, as opposed to a 
> >> wider area over which the rights to the minerals (if any) are owned. The 
> >> old map used by Gough has symbolic representation of the four mineries, and 
> >> whilst not strictly accurate, it is adequate enough to suggest that they 
> >> differ from the liberties.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Mike
> >> 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
> >
> > 
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager