JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GEO-TECTONICS Archives


GEO-TECTONICS Archives

GEO-TECTONICS Archives


GEO-TECTONICS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GEO-TECTONICS Home

GEO-TECTONICS Home

GEO-TECTONICS  June 2010

GEO-TECTONICS June 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Wider thoughts on the italian situation

From:

Alan Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tectonics & structural geology discussion list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:38:39 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (169 lines)

I agree entirely with Gren that geoscientists should be more involved and
visible to the community. Equally we have a responsibility as John says to
ensure that this is based on the best science we can manage. 

We as geoscientists have a key role to play in resource security (oil,
minerals, construction materials, water) and in providing a key component to
responsible development of these necessary resources through-out the
exploration to sequestration cycle plus our roles in seismic hazard and in a
wide field of geotechnics. Geology is central to our ability to continue to
live on this planet with the sort of population we now have and with the
standard of living expectations too which we all aspire. It is indeed these
needs that provide the drivers to fund the pure science for its own sake.

To perform the role and contribute successfully we have to engage with
society at large much more than we do now and as I said in my early post we
do have to make sure we match this with an appropriate responsibility in
what we say. We do have to look to other professions for good models of this
or we run the increasing risk of being the political and media football.

As I indicated we have to be very clear about the level of uncertainty in
our science and to clearly separate a) fact from b) interpretation and c)
opinion with the "error bars" in a way that is understandable by the
stakeholder. The traditional geo-science rough and tumble between an
internal closed group who all know the rules just isn't appropriate any
longer -- and makes us look either unprofessional or just plain stupid to
the outsider. 

We do need to up our game, and fast, if we are to avoid "Italian situations"
where good well intentioned geoscientists find themselves badly exposed. 


Alan



Dr Alan Gibbs
Director
Midland Valley Exploration
144 West George Street
Glasgow
G2 2HG
tel: 44 (0) 141 332 2681
fax: 44 (0) 141 332 6792


[log in to unmask]

www.mve.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Grenville Draper
Sent: 25 June 2010 00:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Wider thoughts on the italian situation

John

While I agree with you about the damage that shallow, business school
notions of accountability as adopted by (and often corrupt) politicians that
have undermined modern science, I disagree with your "scientific
isolationist" stance (I don't mean to be insulting, btw).

Since Earth is the only Planet we live on, we cannot separate our science
from society at large.  Society requires our services to provide the
resources required, and warn it of risks imposed on it by perfectly normal
geological processes. I don't think we have the choice of retreating to the
Ivory Tower.  Your "toxic mix" of science and politics is unavoidable in
fields such as seismology, hydrology, meteorloogy, volcanology, landslides
etc. and society at large provides funding for research in those areas.

The real tragedy is that there is no appreciation of society and its
political leaders of the importance of the geosciences until disaster and
catastrophe occur. After the Haiti earthquake  there was tremendous public
interest in the event and a thirst for explanations of what happened.  Being
close to the subject. I gave countless interviews to the media on the
subject and three public lectures.  It saddened me that it needed a
catastrophe of this magnitude to get society's attention, but it was also an
opportunity.  The neighboring Dominican Republic is equally if not at more,
at risk of seismic catastrophe. If we geoscientist push hard enough , we
might be able to get a seismic emergency plan to the attention of the
politicos. We are continuing to to this.

I agree that it science and politics are toxic, but anything in politics is
toxic.  In my opinion, it is unavoidable. But we have to engage. Society
gives us the money for research, so they want answers, and we have a duty to
to give it to them the answers that they want. 

John, in summary ,  I  think we ought to be MORE engaged in society.  I
always admire and am  amazed by the way the Astronomical community gets more
public and private support than us , even though there is no practical
impact on society. I think we need to do more.

Cheers


Gren



Grenville Draper
Professor, Department of Earth and Environment
Associate Director of Liberal Studies
Fellow of the FIU Honors College
Florida International University
Miami, FL 33199
305-348-3087
________________________________________
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list
[[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John F. Dewey
[[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 5:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: about an attack to Science in Italy

Sorry Umberto and colleagues, I accidentally pressed the SEND button
before finishing the email. I blame the very fine Amarone that I am
drinking this evening.

Dear Umberto,

Thank you for your thoughtful and reasoned analysis for which I am
very grateful in sorting out some of the confusion. I, also, would
like to know the location and qualifications of Matteo Levi. There is
a very distinguished and brilliant Italian Abruzzi film man of this
name. Could it be he?

Again,  when science, politics, and law become entangled, we have a
toxic mix. Alan Gibbs and Dennis Brown have hit the nail on the head.
When scientists are asked to give their "official" considered views
and opinion, they had better be very careful in what they say. They
would do well to keep out of making prognoses and trying to help the
cowboys that inhabit the halls of government. My advice is for
serious scientists to stick to serious science and to avoid the
seductive route to fine hotels, titles, and running things. Keep a
low profile and enjoy your science. Especially, do not become
involved in judging your fellow scientists, the modern trend in
international bureaucracy. Much of modern science is forgetting its
intellectual and scholarly roots.

Best wishes,
John Dewey
--

-----------------------------------
Please update your address book to use [log in to unmask] as my
e-mail address.

Prof. John F. Dewey FRS, Hon. M.R.I.A., Mem. Acad. Eur., For.  Mem.
>  US Nat. Acad. Sci,
>  >  Distinguished Emeritus Professor University of California, Emeritus
>  >  Professor University College Oxford.
>  >
>  >  Sherwood Lodge,
>  >  93 Bagley Wood Road,
>  >  Kennington,
>  >  Oxford OX1 5NA,
>  >  England, UK
>  >
>  >  University College,
>  >  High Street,
>  >  Oxford OX1 4BH
>  >
>  >  Telephone Nos:
>  >  011 44 (0)1865 735525 (home Oxford)
>  >  011 44 (0)1865 276792 (University College Oxford)
>  >  email: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager