JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ZOOARCH Archives


ZOOARCH Archives

ZOOARCH Archives


ZOOARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZOOARCH Home

ZOOARCH Home

ZOOARCH  May 2010

ZOOARCH May 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Identifying decidious horse and donkey teeth?

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 28 May 2010 12:44:27 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (84 lines)

Lena, your difficulties with distinguishing deciduous equine teeth will be
cleared up when you get the opportunity to examine some complete
dentitions of recent equines that died between foalhood and 6 years.
Particularly seek out those that are 3-4 years old, because it is at this
time that the premolar teeth shed.

You will notice several things. First, that the height of the reserve
crown of a deciduous premolar, even in a yearling where it will be at its
highest, is never all that high. The mandible of a yearling horse or
donkey isn't nearly as deep as it will be by the time the animal is mature
at six years of age.

Second, that by the time the tooth is ready to be shed, it will have worn
down almost to the roots. Thus when you find isolated deciduous premolar
teeth of horses, and the tooth has as little remaining reserve crown
height as those you picture, chances are high that the tooth was "spat"
during life. Often the inferior teeth will be split in half through the
metaconid/metastylid area as well, as the tooth is narrow and weak in this
"waist".

Third, that the occlusal enamel pattern of the tooth is "more advanced"
than that which will develop in the permanent dentition of the same
animal. In the case of the genus Equus, this means that the
antero-posteriorly oriented lines of enamel that bracket the lingual and
buccal edges of the crown are straighter (less bowed) than they would be
in the permanent premolars of the same animal; that the
metaconid/metastylid loops are longer and more flattened; and that the
reentrant formed by the entoflexid, which frequently would penetrate the
"neck" leading up to the metaconid/metastylid in the permanent tooth, is
shallower, leaving the "neck" long and undivided. The degree of
crenellation in the enamel bands generally will also be greater.

Size, as you should know, is no guide at all to the specific identity of
equines. You can have biggish donkeys and quite small horses, and,
particularly in a Roman context, you can have mules too.

Despite all the morphometrics that have been done in my lifetime on
equines, I generally don't believe a word of it. I don't think you can
identify any animal, even when there are large (>50) sample sizes, by
measuring and/or computing statistics. It is, rather, shape that
identifies -- and there is no metrical or mensural way that is adequate to
specify shape. Your eyes and brain work fine for this purpose, however.

You do have to have enough grist for that mill, though. I think that in
order to identify any horse from teeth, you have to have, at minimum, a
whole quarter-dentition, i.e. I1-M3 from one jaw quarter. Even better
would be a half-dentition, superior and associated inferior. Best of all
would be the whole skull, so that you can consider diagnostic features
such as the configuration of the mastoid region, the basiocciput, and the
facial profile. The only responsible thing to do with the tooth you
present, in my opinion, is to identify it as "Equus sp."

Deb Bennett, Ph.D., Director
Equine Studies Institute of California
& Zooarchaeologist, Vindolanda


> Dear all,
>
> Is there a good guide to identifying decidious equine teeth? I looked at
> Cluny Johnstone's thesis, but she only discusses the permanent dentitions.
> I have a very small and narrow equine cheek tooth (30.3x11.3mm) from a
> Late Roman rural settlement (UK). The tooth seems juvenile to me. The
> enamel folds are slightly different from the adult horse mandible I have
> in the reference collection, and they don't follow the illustrated adult
> donkey tooth either.
>
> I've uploaded three pictures if anyone wants to attempt an identification.
>
> http://i893.photobucket.com/albums/ac137/ossamentaDW/Benbilder/Foal-donkeytooth1.jpg
> http://i893.photobucket.com/albums/ac137/ossamentaDW/Benbilder/Foal-donkeytooth2.jpg
> http://i893.photobucket.com/albums/ac137/ossamentaDW/Benbilder/Foal-donkeytooth3.jpg
>
> /Lena
>
>
> ------
> Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open
> Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit
> http://iso26300.info for more information.
>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager