Nah, the thread's all over the place, Stephen; but I somehow missed
reading your earlier post all the way through, & would tend to agree
with you, although I've not heard him read. I certainly find that I
cant go very far into one of his pieces without feeling like that's
enough; youve proved your point, & I'm bored now.
I note that he accepts that as a possibility in the interview, while
hoping that what he is doing will have that effect of 'capacitating'
the audience....
Doug
On 4-Apr-10, at 9:07 PM, Stephen Vincent wrote:
> Hi All - I am totally lost on this thread. & the "Etc" here as taken
> the upper hand. Is it about meter, is about reading or is it about
> Bruce Andrews interview? Of course,I just responded to a Bruce
> Andrews public reading experience - which I found difficult
> (obviously) and I did not give the interview the time of day for
> which I apologize. I know the interviewer -and I find him a good
> guy- and I should have read it, and maybe will do. So my bigotry
> might have gotten the upper hand, and maybe still does. Tho I do
> not think my response to that particular reading will ever alter, no
> way.
>
> But maybe somebody here can clarify the thread?
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
Latest books:
Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
Wednesdays'
http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
The secret
which got lost neither hides
nor reveals itself, it shows forth
tokens.
Charles Olson
|