Dear Constanza,
Thank you for your message. I've a lot of respect for Dori's work and enjoy
her writing.
I wonder how you would see it as connecting theories of say emotional design
and engineering design? Please can you say more?
Best wishes,
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related
research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Constanza
Miranda
Sent: Friday, 30 April 2010 12:48 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A new field of design research
Dear all,
Following this thread I would like to suggest the following article about
the trans-disciplinary design condition seen under Russel Bernard's QAME
[Question, Assumptions, Methods, Evidence] framework. A useful and
consistent way seen through the scope of design-anthropology. Yet, it is a
very useful article to understand other trans-disciplinary engagements that
design might perform. This version of the article entails marketing,
nonetheless, a previous version of the same article, the author talks about
the epistemological differences of design research and design practice.
Article written by Elizabeth "Dori"
Tunstall<http://dori3.typepad.com/my_weblog/design_anthropology/>,
you can find it here: EPIC proceedings
2008<http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122518444/abstract?CRETRY=1&
SRETRY=0>
Tunstall, Elizabeth (Dori)
Jul 21, 2008 The QAME of Trans-Disciplinary Ethnography: Making Visible
Disciplinary Theories of Ethnographic Praxis as Boundary Object. EPIC
2008(1):218.
Best,
On 29 April 2010 10:25, jeremy hunsinger <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Well we already have this for research in general. Science and Technology
> Studies, philosophy of science, philosophy of social science, sociology of
> knowledge, sociology of scientific knowledge, etc, etc. Design research
> already uses much of these fields, as it is pretty much hard to avoid them
> if you are doing research. That doesn't stop people from ignoring the
> scholarship in many of the fields, but ehh, that's what we have to do as
> academics to actually get any work done.
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:50 AM, Kari Kuutti wrote:
>
> > Excellent Terry,
> > you get my full support for the 'Epistemology of Design Knowledge and
> Theory'! But we should not limit it to issues internal to design research,
> let's aim higher - to the field of research in general.
> >>
>
> jeremy hunsinger
> Center for Digital Discourse and Culture
> Virginia Tech
> Information Ethics Fellow, Center for Information Policy Research, School
> of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (
> www.cipr.uwm.edu)
>
> () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
> /\ - against microsoft attachments
>
> http://www.aoir.org The Association of Internet Researchers
> http://www.stswiki.org/ stswiki
> http://transdisciplinarystudies.tmttlt.com/ Transdisciplinary Studies:the
> book series
>
--
Constanza S. Miranda M.
PhD Student NCSU-Design
Instructor Design for Social Innovation Studio
www.innovacionsocial.cl
www.facebook.com/designforsocialinnovation
"Develop Design, Design to Develop"
|