JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives


FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives


FILM-PHILOSOPHY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Home

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Home

FILM-PHILOSOPHY  February 2010

FILM-PHILOSOPHY February 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Film and philosophy: general vs specific methodology

From:

Havi Carel <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Film-Philosophy Salon <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 09:31:28 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

One issue I have been interested in lately is the following:
Some people think that film-philosophy ought to be developed as a general program; others insist that the way to 'do' film-philosophy is by specific readings of specific films or even scenes (e.g. Mulhall).

I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on whether film-philosophy is better developed as a general program, or whether it is better developed in a more piecemeal fashion, by engaging with specific film/ scenes and avoiding claims about film in general.

In other words - is film-philosophy a generalisable approach or should philosophical readings of film be tailored only to and limited to a specific film?

(This is not to say that there is only one type of film-philosophy, or that I am only endorsing philosophical readings of film as film-philosophy. This is simply a specific issue I have been thinking about lately.)

Best wishes

Havi

---

Dr Havi Hannah Carel
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
University of the West of England
St Matthias Campus
Oldbury Court Road
Fishponds
Bristol BS16 2JP
UK

Tel.: +44 (0)117 907 9359

URL: http://www.uwe.ac.uk/hlss/politics/staff_hcarel.shtml


Every year more than 1,000 people in the UK die waiting for a transplant.
Are you an organ donor? If not, go to
http://www.uktransplant.org.uk/ukt/how_to_become_a_donor/how_to_become_a_donor.jsp
________________________________________
From: Film-Philosophy Salon [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of William Brown [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 27 February 2010 11:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: New Title: Moving People, Moving Images: Cinema and Trafficking in the New Europe

Dear friends and colleagues,

I am writing to announce the release of Moving People, Moving Images:
Cinema and Trafficking in the New Europe by William Brown, Dina
Iordanova, and Leshu Torchin.

I hope this is of interest to you.

***

Moving People, Moving Images: Cinema and Trafficking in the New Europe

ISBN (13): 978-1-9066-7803-6 (paperback)
Price £17.99 (UK), $29.00 (US)
257pp.
Available for purchase from: http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/filmbooks

In the past decade, the dramatic rise in migration and the demise of
national borders across the ‘new’ Europe have helped to turn human
traffic into one of the dominant narratives of contemporary cinema.
Moving People, Moving Images focuses on the current cycle of films
that play upon global anxieties about trafficking and reflects on
recent films that depict white slavery, drug trafficking and
undocumented labour. The volume considers a range of films including
the work of internationally renowned directors such as Promised Land
(Amos Gitaï), Lorna’s Silence (the Dardenne Brothers) and Ghosts (Nick
Broomfield), popular genres such as Taken (Pierre Morel), and lesser
known but unquestionably important works such as The Bus (Tunç Okan)
and When Mother Comes Home for Christmas (Nilita Vachani).


***
‘Moving People, Moving Images is a groundbreaking and much-needed
study of the intersections between film and human trafficking… This
volume is both a complete and valuable teaching tool, and a precious
resource for future research, and sets the agenda for more work in
this all-important area.’
--- Laura Rascaroli, University College Cork, Ireland

‘One of the attractions of this book is precisely that it refuses to
tread lightly and tentatively across the well-established divide
between cinematic representations and socio-political issues. It makes
a provocative argument for the political effect of films and proposes
that human trafficking should not be the rightful, let alone the
exclusive, domain of governments, NGOs, activist organizations and the
social sciences.’
-- Aniko Imre, University of Southern California



***
About the authors:

William Brown teaches Film Studies at the University of St Andrews.
His research interests include digital technology and cinema,
cognitive approaches to cinema, and transnational cinema.  His work
has been published in various journals and edited collections, and he
is the co-editor of Deleuze and Film (Edinburgh University Press,
2011).  He is the editor/manager of the collaborative film blog,
http://cinemasalon.ning.com.

Dina Iordanova has built an academic career as a specialist on the
cinema of Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Her more recent work is
focused on business models and distribution patterns within the
international film industries. She is Director of the Centre for Film
Studies at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, where she leads
The Leverhulme Trust-funded project ‘Dynamics of World Cinema’
(www.st-andrews.ac.uk/worldcinema). She is also the editor and
publisher of the Film Festival Yearbook (FFY) series, which has
recently released Film Festival Yearbook 2: Film Festivals and
Imagined Communities. Her recent work appears in Cinema at the
Periphery (2010) and her blog, Dinaview.com.

Leshu Torchin teaches Film Studies at the University of St Andrews.
Her research focus is on screen media, advocacy, and human rights. Her
work has appeared in a range of publications including Third Text,
Film & History, American Anthropologist, and Cineaste and in
collections such as The Image and the Witness: Trauma, Memory and
Visual Culture (Wallflower, 2007). She is currently completing her
book project, Creating the Witness: Genocide in the Age of Film, Video
and the Internet.

*
*
Film-Philosophy salon
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For technical help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon
*
Film-Philosophy online: http://www.film-philosophy.com
Contact: [log in to unmask]
**


This incoming email to UWE has been independently scanned for viruses by McAfee anti-virus software and none were detected

This email was independently scanned for viruses by McAfee anti-virus software and none were found

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager