The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  February 2010

DISABILITY-RESEARCH February 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: User led organisations of disabled people and people with hidden impairments

From:

Stephen Hodgkins <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stephen Hodgkins <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:06:07 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (101 lines)

Thanks for sharing this Harvey.

I think it's a elephant in the room for DPOs, and something that needs much more discussion, in order to ensure there is both the authentic voice of disabled people controlling our organisations, and the skills needed for effective governance of them. There is of course also a role for non disabled allies who support the struggle against disablism to be part of this, but not in a majority.

While I want for my colleagues on my DPO board to be 'out, loud and proud' about their impairments and experience of disablism, I also want us to collectively make effective decisions about running the organisation. Sometimes this happens, sometimes not. As the point Larry makes repeated, disclosure and ownership of impairment is not a straightforward thing and so you never can be completely unified because sometimes disability is relevant, sometimes not.

One way of getting round it is to ensure when you recruit to a board, people have to disclose but that this will be treated sensitively and with respect. Then as part of the board practise their has to be some leadership and positive culture of disability on the board, so it becomes OK to be 'out, loud and proud'. Equally, those non disabled people involved in the organisation need to have some leadership and positive culture so that the understand their roles as allies and face the struggle together with us. After all disabled people and their allies both want inclusion, period!

How you do the leadership and positive culture will vary from place to place, but whats crucial to this is to know what the common ground within the group is, and then as you grow long in the tooth together, be sure to remember what that is. So if you fall out, you will know what connects you. If you have nothing in common, you are unfortunately in the wrong group, I think. That's not to say you shouldn't embrace your differences, indeed through diversity is strength, but unless you know what binds you, you cant know how to overcome what it is you face.

Would be keen to discuss more, on or off list.

Stephen





-----Original Message-----
From: The Disability-Research Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Harvey Cowe
Sent: 23 February 2010 19:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: User led organisations of disabled people and people with hidden impairments

Dear All,

I am a trustee of my local user led organisation of disabled people and have
become increasingly aware of how most of the decisions are being made by the
chief officer, who is nondisabled and other waged members of staff who I
assumed were also nondisabled. When I mentioned the fact that as a user led
organisation, the trustees, all of whom have visible impairments, should be
making decisions and not following decisions made by non-disabled people, I
have been accused of failing in my duty as an employer, making assumptions,
being a hypocrite, an angry man, trouble-maker and a barrage of other
personal insults.

They are right, I have made assumptions about who is and is not disabled
within the organisation, but what else can I do if the people choose to hide
their impairments.
I understand that a person does not have to disclose impairment to employers
and I can totally understand why someone would hide their impairment from
the general public -in order to avoid being subjected to prejudice and
discrimination. I can also understand that a person might deny their
impairment to themselves as a way of defence mechanism, "I'm not one of
them" kind of thing. But I find it difficult to understand why someone
would want to hide their impairment from other disabled people within an
organisation of disabled people.

I thought that peer support was one of the reasons we had organisations of
disabled people, to help negate the emotional effects of disablism, to help
take away the shame etc. More importantly, how does this logic pan out
when a user-led organisation stipulates that a certain percentage of the
board have to be disabled? If a person does not have to disclose whether or
not they are a disabled person or have impairments then how would they know
how many disabled people are on the board? This means that such
organisations can only be sure by taking on people whose obvious impairments
can be displayed rather than disabled people with hidden impairments
otherwise people looking from outside might begin to make assumptions.

I would be interested in any other people's thoughts on the issue.

Thank you,

Harvey Cowe

________________End of message________________

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]

Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.


Visit our website at http://www.disabilitylib.org.uk/

This message, and any file(s) transmitted with it are confidential
and are intended only for the person(s) to whom they have been
addressed by the sender. This message may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, or if you believe it was transmitted to you in error, you are
required to delete the message and any copies of it, and to notify the
sender immediately. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying, distribution,
or printing of this message or accompanying files, or unauthorised use
of any information contained therein, by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Any views expressed in this message or in any file(s) transmitted with
it are those of the author, and may not necessarily represent the
views of Disability Lib.

________________End of message________________

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]

Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager