Maybe what is revealed is that the film's 'liberal appeal for change'
is itself insufficient ...
Henry
> Alan Fair,
>
> Could you explain what "truth" you think is revealed by this
> "fortuitous juxtaposition"?
>
>
>> . This moment is, to paraphraseAndre Breton, the fortuitous
>> juxtaposition of (in)congruent objects;two objects in a kind of
>> accidental montage that reveal a truth inherentin the fiction of
>> Kazan's film.
>
> I understand that newsreel footage of an organized Slovak Nazi
> demonstration against Jews c. 1938 is juxtaposed against a fictional
> postwar situation of social discrimination against a Jew. But what
> is the "truth" that is revealed? Kazan's film first appeared in the
> shadow of WW2 and the revelation of Holocaust. Certainly the
> audience understood what anti-Semitism was at that time and what
> kind of a liberal appeal for change it was promoting. Even much
> later, or today, the film rather clearly and obviously shows anti-
> Semitism to be a bad thing, backward, unfair, undemocratic, etc.
>
> I don't quite see what connection (or conclusion from juxtaposition)
> you are making.
>
> Chuck Kleinhans
>
>
*
*
Film-Philosophy salon
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For technical help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon
*
Film-Philosophy online: http://www.film-philosophy.com
Contact: [log in to unmask]
**
|