JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives


LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives

LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives


LIS-PUB-LIBS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PUB-LIBS Home

LIS-PUB-LIBS Home

LIS-PUB-LIBS  October 2009

LIS-PUB-LIBS October 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: UK Public Library Initiative

From:

"Usher, John" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Usher, John

Date:

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:09:35 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (532 lines)

Sorry, whaddya mean: 

'...maybe this consequence wasn't recognised before the service was
launched?...'

I suspect more a case of '..we know it's a potential issue - but let's
cross that bridge when we come to it..'

I certainly raised it with online suppliers when we talked about
connection - I even had to brief one new voluntary sector supplier in
the last year on how to set up user number authenticaton and the
possible authentication pitfalls. Tthey hadn't done it before, and
hadn't talked to any other supplier...

We still haven't come to terms with all the video content we need to
stream across the public PC's inside the libraries - I had a recent
complaint from staff about the failure of video content from an online
subsciiption newspaper. I raised issues like that with the DCMS PN team
at the start -and we still haven't fixed it all.

I think there are two ways to look at this - 'pragmatic' or 'ostrich'.

The first (reasonably, I feel) says - 'let's do something. If we wait
for the 'right' solution we'll never get it off the ground. We'll fix it
later'.

The second digs the head in the sand and says 'there is no problem'.

Let's hope it's the former, and we can move forward - but to paraphrase
Mick 'who to do and what to do?'

It's a Wild West comedy (Blazing Saddles?  City Slickers?) in this area
- you have to laugh or you'ld cry - and the solutions tend to lag the
ability to handle issues.

 Indeed, there is a philosophy which says 'if you can do it properly,
it's obolete' - another says 'when you're on the (b)leading edge,
remember to stand behihd the blade...' 

I heard a debate on Radio 4 last Friday lunchtime (no, I was off work
that day, not moonlighting in work time...) with UK TV licence payers
with slow (or no) broadband connection bemoaning the fact that they
could'nt use iPlayer when users around the world could. 

The Head Honcho of such things @ the Beeb wasn't (IMHO) terribly
concilatory (the fact that they could get it out there to support the
Beeb's prestige seemed to outweigh the taxpayers concerns), but the
programme raised the issue of controls at national boundaries - which is
an echo of Mick's comment.

And in case anyone asks, no, I'm not being paid by Mick and I don't even
know him in the non-virtual world!

Ye-ha! Ride 'em Cowboy! 


JU


John Usher 
ICT Manager 
Library and Heritage Services 
Islington Council 
Central Library 
2 Fieldway Crescent 
LONDON N5 1PF 

Tel: 020 7527 6920 
Mobile: 07825 098 223 
Fax: 020 7527 6926 
Alternative contact: Michelle Gannon - 020 7527 6907 

www.islington.gov.uk 


How to get to Central Library:
http://www.islington.gov.uk/Education/Libraries/Local/Central.asp 



-----Original Message-----
From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mick Fortune
Sent: 20 October 2009 12:46
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LIS-PUB-LIBS] UK Public Library Initiative

Well it was the MLA that brokered the first deal so they can get their
act together sometimes...

I think the real problem here is that maybe this consequence wasn't
recognised before the service was launched? If anyone can join (and they
can) and use the service from anywhere they can access the internet (and
I was using it from the USA) there is clearly a problem. Leeds and
Brighton - to name but two of many - at least require you to visit one
of their branches to complete registration but to join Oldham or
Manchester all you need is a UK address - you don't have to prove you
live there. Of course, once you have a library card you can join any
other library service you like
- (see SCL initiative). So you can use ANY UK public library service
without ever proving UK residency. But that's another topic
altogether...

The answer would seem to be for a new deal for online services - before
it's too late to put the genie back in the bottle. But who can broker
such a deal, and how do we make it secure? 

This message comes to you courtesy of 3G networking and yes, I can still
get online services from here too.

Mick

Mick Fortune       
m. +44 (0)7786 625544         t.   +44 (0)1865 727411

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:LIS-PUB- 
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dash Graham
> Sent: 20 October 2009 12:07
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: UK Public Library Initiative
> 
>  But my understanding is that the 'Referrer' has to have some set up 
> to identify where the request has come from unless it's completely
"open"
> and I can't see too many subscription providers wanting that!
> As for the 3G connection, again, if access is through the library OPAC

> it doesn't matter where in the world you are.
> 
> Our "internal" subscribed database access is, as far as I'm aware, all

> via our outgoing IP addresses (2 of them). If using your Library User 
> ID and PIN, whether from home or in the library makes no real 
> difference as far as I can see. The providers' servers still can't see

> where in the world you are logging in from, their only concern is 
> surely with the validity of your User ID and PIN.
> 
> The simple solution is for a nationwide database access service, and 
> as someone has already commented, this is where the MLA ought to step
in.
> But when have the MLA ever got their act together on topics like this?
> (My views entirely, and not those of my authority).
> 
> Also, it would really need every library to want to provide access to 
> every database, and I've had enough problems getting access to just 
> one supplier's databases via our OPAC!
> 
> Graham
> 
> Graham Dash, MCLIP, Library Services Manager (Systems & Development) 
> Environment & Leisure Group, Leisure & Libraries London Borough of 
> Sutton, Central Library, St Nicholas Way, SUTTON, Surrey  SM1 1EA .
> 
> Tel.: 020 8770 4763, Mobile: 07515137830, Fax: 020 8770 4777
> 
> Borough web site: www.sutton.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=907
> Library Catalogue web site: www.sutton-libraries.gov.uk
> 
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Usher, John [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 20 October 2009 11:54
> To: Dash Graham; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: [LIS-PUB-LIBS] UK Public Library Initiative
> 
> As I understand it, unless a 'Referrer' is set up on the library OPAC 
> (or is that actually the corporate website on which the OPAC link is 
> placed? can it be either), the request will come from the IP allocated

> to the user's PC by their ISP?
> 
> But if my ISP is registered at my home, what does the supplier see if 
> I use it on a 3G connection - my home or my geographic location?
> 
> And do I assume that access to online resources on a public PC in a 
> library is by IP authentication? But if not, and I use my User Number 
> in another authority? (I live in one london borough, close to a 
> county, work in another borough, and regularly pass through two or 
> three other boroughs I could use)
> 
> What then?
> 
> JU
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dash Graham
> Sent: 20 October 2009 10:53
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [LIS-PUB-LIBS] UK Public Library Initiative
> 
> 
>  ... And how does the online provider know you're from a different 
> location? The access will probably be via the library OPAC and it's 
> the referral from that that the provider's server will see, and access

> to an OPAC is available from anywhere.
> 
> Graham
> 
> Graham Dash, MCLIP, Library Services Manager (Systems & Development) 
> Environment & Leisure Group, Leisure & Libraries London Borough of 
> Sutton, Central Library, St Nicholas Way, SUTTON, Surrey  SM1 1EA .
> 
> Tel.: 020 8770 4763, Mobile: 07515137830, Fax: 020 8770 4777
> 
> Borough web site: www.sutton.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=907
> Library Catalogue web site: www.sutton-libraries.gov.uk
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Tanner
> Sent: 20 October 2009 10:39
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: UK Public Library Initiative
> 
> Mick
> I'm curious! How did Manchester send you your PIN? Email or separate 
> post? btw don't you think that the access logs of these online 
> providers (BSI etc)are soon going to close this down? They will 
> clearly show visitors from non-subscribing cities/towns etc.
> David
> 
> --
> 
> David Tanner
> Manager: Stock and Systems
> Adult and Community Services (Information) North Yorkshire County 
> Council Library HQ
> 21 Grammar School Lane
> Northallerton
> North Yorkshire
> DL6 1DF
> Tel: 01609 533814
> Fax: 01609 780793
> email: [log in to unmask]
> 
> At the moment I am reading Head-On/Repossessed by Julian Cope
> 
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Head-Repossessed-Julian-Cope/dp/0007197756
> 
> http://www.headheritage.co.uk/julian_cope/storyofthedrude/
> 
> 
> >>> On 19/10/2009 at 4:59 pm, in message 
> >>> <001701ca50d5$1e824370$5b86ca50$@com>,
> Mick Fortune <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Returned from holiday to find more cards arrived from Oldham and 
> > Manchester Libraries.
> >
> > I can't really see how either places any real restrictions on use
> that
> 
> > might be in any way enforceable by the libraries. I've put pictures
> of
> 
> > the cards and instructions I've received so far on my blog
> > (http://mickfortune.com/WMU/muse/2009/10/19/online-services-a-free-
> lun
> > ch/) for anyone who's interested in seeing how this works in
> practice.
> >
> > Those libraries that are still trying to maintain some semblance of 
> > regulating use (like Rotherham) seem to be in danger of losing 
> > ground to Oldham and Manchester. With more and more resources moving

> > online it would seem that the battle for market share of the UK's 
> > online population is already underway!
> >
> >
> >
> > Mick Fortune
> > m. +44 (0)7786 625544         t.   +44 (0)1865 727411
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:LIS-PUB- 
> >> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Heaton, Mark
> >> Sent: 13 October 2009 09:06
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: Re: UK Public Library Initiative
> >>
> >> We've offered limited (2 books only) "guest" membership without 
> >> need for ID for some time, so the National Membership initiative is

> >> not a major change in practice for us joining people. However, what
> doesn't
> 
> >> appear to have been considered is the cost/mechanics of returning 
> >> books that are brought in to us by a returning holiday maker who 
> >> borrowed them from somewhere else in the "national library 
> >> service"... We don't issue national library tickets (yet) either.
> >>
> >> Like many others we allow online registration but insist on 
> >> collection of tickets from a library - a policy motivated by our 
> >> desire for footfall/visitor figures and difficulty in accurately 
> >> monitoring online usage. Online membership and use of resources 
> >> online (e.g. Manchester) seems to be time limited (small print?) 
> >> but it does raise the issue of national agreement on
subscriptions...
> >>
> >> Mark
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Mark Heaton
> >>
> >> Manager, Library Service Design & Development
> >>
> >> Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
> >>
> >> Tel:.01709 823619
> >>
> >> *  <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> [log in to unmask]
> >>
> >> web.  <http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/libraries>
> >> www.rotherham.gov.uk/libraries
> >>
> >> Customer Service line (01709) 336774
> >>
> >> PThink before you print - please consider the impact on the 
> >> environment before printing this document.P
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:LIS-PUB- 
> >> [log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mick Fortune
> >> Sent: 29 September 2009 09:54
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: UK Public Library Initiative
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It's eerily quiet here... With such a high profile day for UK 
> >> public libraries yesterday I was expecting to see much more comment

> >> and opinion on this of all lists. Is there some filter operating 
> >> that prevents my reading my colleague's opinions whilst I'm out of 
> >> the country or is this news not perhaps as momentous as the press 
> >> would have me believe?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Or is everyone overwhelmed with the demand from a
> "newly-enfranchised"
> >> public?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> One small concern - among the many that spring to mind about the 
> >> SCL initiative - is the question of who now pays for online
services?
> >> Should I now be lobbying Oxfordshire to cancel their subscription 
> >> to online information services because I, and everyone else in 
> >> England, Wales and Northern Ireland, can now access them by joining

> >> say, Manchester online?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> How will the companies providing these services stay in business if

> >> only one authority pays a sub? I'm grateful to Manchester for 
> >> giving me access to BSI data but worried that the BSI may not be 
> >> able to afford to live with this state of affairs. Will Manchester 
> >> council tax payers be prepared to pick up the tab for the whole
country?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Or am I missing something?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Mick Fortune
> >>
> >> m. +44 (0)7786 625544         t.   +44 (0)1865 727411
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>   _____
> >>
> >>
> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely 
> >> for the use of the individual to whom it was addressed.  If you are

> >> not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this 
> >> e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding,
> printing
> 
> >> or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
> >> received this e- mail in error, please advise the sender by using
> the
> 
> >> reply facility in your e-mail software, and then delete it from 
> >> your system. Rotherham MBC may monitor the content of the e-mails 
> >> sent
> and
> 
> >> received via its network for the purposes of ensuring compliance
> with
> 
> >> the law and with RMBC policies. Any views or opinions presented are

> >> only those of the author and not those of Rotherham MBC.
> >>
> >>   _____
> >>
> >>
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.21/2445 - Release Date:
> >> 10/19/09 06:40:00
> Access your county council services online 24 hours a day, 7 days a 
> week at www.northyorks.gov.uk.
> 
> WARNING
> 
> Any opinions or statements expressed in this e-mail are those of the 
> individual and not necessarily those of North Yorkshire County
Council.
> 
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this in 
> error, please do not disclose any information to anyone, notify the 
> sender at the above address and then destroy all copies.
> 
> North Yorkshire County Council?s computer systems and communications 
> may be monitored to ensure effective operation of the system and for 
> other lawful purposes. All GCSX traffic may be subject to recording 
> and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
> 
> Although we have endeavoured to ensure that this e-mail and any 
> attachments are free from any virus we would advise you to take any 
> necessary steps to ensure that they are actually virus free.
> 
> If you receive an automatic response stating that the recipient is 
> away from the office and you wish to request information under either 
> the Freedom of Information Act, the Data Protection Act or the 
> Environmental Information Regulations please forward your request by 
> e- mail to the Data Management Team
> ([log in to unmask]) who will process your 
> request.
> 
> North Yorkshire County Council.
> 
> 
> This email and the information it contains are confidential and 
> intended solely for the exclusive use of the individual to whom it is 
> addressed.
> If you are not the intended recipient, this email should not be 
> copied, forwarded, or printed for any purpose, or the contents 
> disclosed to any other person. If you have received this email in 
> error, please notify the London Borough of Sutton immediately on 
> +44(020) 8770 5000 or email [log in to unmask] and then delete
the email.
> 
> Although the London Borough of Sutton operates anti-virus programmes, 
> it does not accept any responsibility for any damage whatsoever that 
> is caused by viruses being passed.
> 
> This message has been scanned for malware.
> **********************************************************************
> *
> *****************
> 
> This Email, and any attachments, may contain Protected, Restricted or 
> Legally Privileged information and is intended solely for the 
> individual to whom it is addressed.  It may contain sensitive or 
> protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly.
> 
> If this Email has been misdirected, please notify the author 
> immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not 
> disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on any of the information 
> contained in it or attached, and all copies must be deleted 
> immediately.
> 
> Whilst we take reasonable steps to try to identify any software 
> viruses, any attachments to this Email may nevertheless contain 
> viruses which our anti-virus software has failed to identify.  You 
> should therefore carry out your own anti-virus checks before opening 
> any documents.
> 
> Islington Council will not accept any liability for damage caused by 
> computer viruses emanating from any attachment or other document 
> supplied with this e-mail. All Email communications may be subject to 
> recording and / or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
> 
> Information contained in this Email may be subject to public 
> disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or the 
> Environmental Information Regulations 2004. Unless the information is 
> legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this Email and 
> your reply cannot be guaranteed.
> 
> If you wish to re-use the information, perhaps for commercial 
> purposes, in a way which, without permission, might breach our 
> copyright, please first read our policy on Re-use of Public Sector 
> Information which can be found on our website 
> http://www.islington.gov.uk/freedomofinformation or alternatively e- 
> mail [log in to unmask] Any part of this Email which is purely 
> personal in nature is not authorised by London Borough of Islington.
> 
> Contact Islington switchboard: +44 20 7527 2000 www.islington.gov.uk
> **********************************************************************
> *
> *****************
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.23/2447 - Release Date:
> 10/20/09 03:55:00
****************************************************************************************

This Email, and any attachments, may contain Protected, Restricted or Legally Privileged information and is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed.  It may contain sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly.
 
If this Email has been misdirected, please notify the author immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on any of the information contained in it or attached, and all copies must be deleted immediately.
 
Whilst we take reasonable steps to try to identify any software viruses, any attachments to this Email may nevertheless contain viruses which our anti-virus software has failed to identify.  You should therefore carry out your own anti-virus checks before opening any documents.
 
Islington Council will not accept any liability for damage caused by computer viruses emanating from any attachment or other document supplied with this e-mail. All Email communications may be subject to recording and / or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
 
Information contained in this Email may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. Unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this Email and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
 
If you wish to re-use the information, perhaps for commercial purposes, in a way which, without permission, might breach our copyright, please first read our policy on Re-use of Public Sector Information which can be found on our website http://www.islington.gov.uk/freedomofinformation or alternatively e-mail [log in to unmask] Any part of this Email which is purely personal in nature is not authorised by London Borough of Islington.
 
Contact Islington switchboard: +44 20 7527 2000 www.islington.gov.uk
****************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager