On Sep 30, 2009, at 3:14 AM, Kevin Hilton wrote:
> So should the argument be to increase the effort required to
> continue on
> this unsustainable path? This would suggest new policies and
> regulations, but they all take time to agree. Time we don't have.
>
> So maybe we need to develop and reinforce social embarrassment within
> the networks as immediate feedback of what is unacceptable.
Kev: I think you meant to say "increase the effort to get off this
unsustainable path."
By all means, both as individuals and by influencing social groups.
While social embarrassment (and local laws) have reduced the number of
smokers, it doesn't seem to work in many other circumstances. However,
when the message is clear enough people do change their behavior to
act for the greater good (Seat belts, handicapped accessibility,
etc). Often this is due to promoting the benefits and rewards for
doing so until a tipping point is reached. Many utilities, for example
are now leaving the US Chamber of Commerce, because of its denial of
climate change. This should encourage other companies to question
their position. Energy efficient building is now accepted by most
clients as the way to go. etc. Good things do happen through personal
initiatives, good leaders (Obama, etc) and changes in economic and
social values. We just need to be vigorous in our efforts to improve
the quality of life in whatever ways we can. Often this means going
against the flow.
Chuck
|